http://www.chemistrymag.org/cji/2004/068055ne.htm |
Aug. 1, 2004 Vol.6 No.8 P.55 Copyright |
The determination and characteristics of trace arsenic(Ⅲ), total arsenic, antimony(III) and total antimony in water
Qiao Fengxia 1,2, Sun Hanwen 1, Yan Hongyuan1,2 , Liang Shuxuan1
( 1Key Laboratory of Analytical Science and Technology of Heibei Province, College of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002; 2Department of Chemistry, Baoding Teacher's College, Baoding , 071051,China)
Received May 3, 2004; Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province for the project No.203110.
Abstract The determination and
characteristics of trace arsenic(III), total arsenic, antimony(III) and total antimony in three kinds of water was investigated by a recommendatory method - simultaneous
determination of trace Arsenic(III), total arsenic, antimony(III) and total antimony in water by interrupted
injection-hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry. The result showed that the
ignored life wasted water had a potential harm to people.
Keywords Hydride generation; Atomic fluorescence spectrometry; Arsenic; Antimony;
Characteristics
1 INTRODUCTION
The determination of trace arsenic and antimony, especially their species, has
received increasing attention in environmental pollution studies. The toxicity of arsenic
and antimony varies widely, ranging from highly hazardous inorganic species to relatively
harmless organic species[1]. As(III) is more toxic than
As(V) , and Sb(III) is ten times more toxic than Sb(V). Therefore,
from a toxicological point total concentration data are not sufficient and special studies
have to be performed to assess the facing risk due to arsenic and antimony containing
water.
A simple, sensitive and accurate method was required for the
determination of trace levels of arsenic and antimony in water, which directly affected
the precision and accuracy. Recently some analytical methods had already been developed
for arsenic and antimony analysis, such as DCP-AES[2], ICP-MS[3],
HPLC-ICP-MS[4], HG-AAS [5], HG-AFS[6], of which the most
popular and preferred one in terms of simplicity , sensitivity , precision , speed, and
less expensive instrumentation is atomic spectral analysis ,especially HG-AFS. But the
procedure of simultaneous determination of As and Sb determination was too complicate for
application.
We have proposed a new method for simultaneous determination of As and
Sb by interrupted injection-hydride generation atomic fluorescence Spectrometry (HG –AFS), to study their dissolving capability and their assimilation
at stomach and intestine acidity.[7] Our aims of this work described here was
to use this simple, sensitive, precise, speed and inexpensive technique for the
simultaneous determination and characterization of arsenic and antimony species in water,
which would help controlling and preventing from the pollution of As and Sb.
2 EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Apparatus
A model AFS-230 double-channel nondispersive atomic fluorescence spectrometer (Beijing
Haiguang Analytical Instrument Co., Beijing, China) equipped with As and Sb two hollow
cathode lamps(general Research Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals, Beijing, China) was used
for all the determinations. The operating parameters are given in Table 1.
Table 1 Instrument parameters and operating conditions
Conditions |
As |
Sb |
High voltage of PMT ( V) |
300 |
300 |
Atomizer temperature(ºC) |
300 |
300 |
Atomizer height (mm) |
7.5 |
7.5 |
Lamp current (mA) |
60 |
80 |
Flow rate of carrier gas(mL·min-1) |
400 |
400 |
Flow rate of shield gas (mL·min-1) |
800 |
800 |
Meas. Method |
Std. Curve |
Std. Curve |
Read Method |
Peak Area |
Peak Area |
2.2 Reagents
All reagents used were of the highest available purity, and of at least analytical grade.
Sub-boiling distilled water was used throughout this work.
The As(III) standard stock solution , 1.000 g·L-1.
The Sb(III) standard stock solution, 1.000 g·L-1.
Working standard solutions of As(III), Sb(III) were prepared by
stepwise dilution of the stock solutions just before use.
The KBH4 solutions were prepared daily by dissolving the
reagent in 0.3% (m/v) sodium hydroxide solution. The L-cysteine solutions were prepared by
dissolving the reagent in water.
2.3 Procedure
2.3.1 Sample pretreatment
The water sample was filtered through a 0.45μm
membrane to get rid of solid substance. Adjusted acid concentration of hydrochloric acid
was 0.02-0.06 mol·L-1. They were kept at 4ºC before analysis.
2.3.2 Determination of arsenic and antimony species
An aliquot of the sample solution (1.0 mL), a 12.5 mL of L-cysteine solution, a 2.1 mL of
hydrochloric acid (2.0 mol·L-1) were mixed together, then diluted to
25.0 mL with water. This solution was set aside for 15 min at room temperature for the
determination of total arsenic and total antimony by HGAFS
A 1.0 mL of the sample solution was added into acetic acid-sodium
acetate buffer solution to obtain a 25.0 mL sample solution (pH 5.0), then the
concentration of As(III) and Sb(III) were determined directly by HG-AFS.
Table 2. Determination of As(III) and Sb(III) in water samples
Samples |
As(Ⅲ) |
Sb(Ⅲ) |
|||||||
Content* |
Added(mg·L-1) |
Recovery(%) |
RSD(%) |
Content*(mg·L-1) |
Added(mg·L-1) |
Recovery(%) |
RSD(%) |
||
Binhe-water |
2.46 |
10.0 |
104.0 |
2.7 |
2.39 |
10.0 |
100.4 |
1.3 |
|
Tap water |
0.25 |
5.0 |
100.9 |
3.1 |
0.19 |
5.0 |
100.2 |
1.9 |
|
Mineral water |
ND |
5.0 |
100.1 |
3.4 |
ND |
5.0 |
98.0 |
2.1 |
|
Mineral water |
0.2 |
5.0 |
99.5 |
4.0 |
ND |
5.0 |
106.0 |
3.7 |
|
Chemical industry water | 2.58 |
5.0 |
97.4 |
4.3 |
0.54 |
5.0 |
98.9 |
4.2 |
|
Medical industry water | 2.96 |
5.0 |
102.0 |
4.1 |
0.44 |
5.0 |
104.5 |
4.5 |
Table 3 Determination of total As and total Sb in water samples
Sample |
Total As |
Percent of As3+ |
Total Sb |
Percent of Sb3+ |
|||||||
Content* |
Added |
Recovery |
RSD |
Content* |
Added |
Recovery |
RSD |
||||
Binhe water |
4.18 |
10.0 |
100.3 |
3.7 |
58.85 |
7.35 |
10.0 |
97.8 |
2.8 |
32.52 |
|
Tap water |
1.16 |
5.0 |
100.4 |
2.0 |
21.55 |
1.21 |
5.0 |
98.4 |
1.8 |
15.7 |
|
Mineral water(1) |
0.15 |
5.0 |
99.9 |
2.9 |
* |
0.9 |
5.0 |
98.2 |
2.6 |
# |
|
Mineral water(2) |
0.31 |
5.0 |
100.6 |
3.2 |
64.52 |
ND |
5.0 |
99.2 |
3.0 |
# |
|
Chemical industry water | 6.40 |
5.0 |
98.4 |
4.3 |
40.31 |
1.21 |
5.0 |
96.5 |
3.8 |
44.62 |
|
medical industry water | 10.1 |
10.0 |
98.7 |
4.1 |
29.31 |
1.42 |
10.0 |
95.9 |
3.4 |
30.98 |
For the analysis of As
and Sb, we divided the six kinds of water into three groups: drinking water(tap water,
mineral water(1) and mineral water(2)), life-wasted water( Binhe water) and
industry-wasted water (Chemical industry water
and medical industry water)
As Table 2 and 3 shown, this three groups of water have their own
characteristics. For the life-wasted water, though the total content of As was not the
highest, the percent of As3+ to total As was higher. For the element Sb, the
total content of Sb was the highest in the three groups of water and the percent of Sb3+
to total Sb was much higher. This indicated that there is a potential harm still
existing. We must pay much attention to the life-wasted water's treatment.
For the industry-wasted water, the total content of As and Sb and the
percentage of As3+ and Sb3+ were both higher. Though the total
content of Sb3+ was lower than life wasted water, but its percentage was of the
highest. Still the industry-wasted water required more effective controlled management.
For drinking water, although in mineral (2) the percentage of As3+
was higher, from a whole point, both As and Sb and their species were listed in the lowest
content.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In the past years, drinking water and industry
water were more regarded by people with a series of protecting device. While life wasted
water were neglected. It is an urgent task for us to take some effective measures for
life-wasted water's treatment.
水体中的砷
(Ⅲ),总砷,锑(Ⅲ),总锑的测定及分布特征