Improved ultrasound-induced
synthesis of 1,5-diaryl-1,4-pentadien-3-ones
Chen Guofeng, Li Jitai, Duan Huiyun, Li Tongshuang
(College of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Hebei University; Key
Laboratory of Analytical Science and Technology, Hebei Province, Baoding 071002,
China)
Received Nov. 4, 2003; Supported by
Educational Ministry of China and Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (203107),
China.
Abstract Synthesis
of 1,5-diaryl-1,4-pentadien-3-ones from acetone or benzalacetone with aromatic aldehydes
is carried out in excellent yields with potassium hydroxide as catalyst under ultrasound
irradiation.
Keywords dibenzalacetone; Claisen-Schmidt condensation; ultrasound.
1 INTRODUCTION
The 1,5-diaryl-1,4-pentadien-3-ones are used as precursors to potentially bioactive
pyrimidine derivatives [1], intermediates of spiro prostaglandin analog which
might act as a mediator in many physiological activities[2] and optically
active poly(g-ketosulfide)s[3].
Preparation of 1,5-diaryl-1,4-pentadien-3-ones is usually completed via Claisen-Schmidt
condensation between acetone and aromatic aldehydes using conventional stirring or heating
method [4-6]. However, there were some shortcoming in terms of long reaction
time or low yield. Gupta et al. have reported that the preparation of
1,5-diaryl-1,4-pentadien-3-ones catalyzed by sodium hydroxide under microwave gave good
yield[7]. Further there are no reports to our knowledge about the use of
ultrasound-induce the condensation between acetone or benzalacetone with aromatic
aldehydes.
Ultrasound has been used more and more frequently in organic synthesis
in recent three decades[8]. Compared with traditional methods, this method is
more convenient and easily controlled.A great many of organic reactions can be carried in
higher yields, shorter reaction time or milder conditions under ultrasound irradiation.
Recently, our laboratory has reported the Claisen-Schmidt condensation of furfural with
cycloalkanones catalyzed by NaOH under ultrasound irradiation, and the results are better
than that under conventional heating condition [9]. In continuation
of broad programme being pursued in our laboratory on ultrasound-induced organic
reactions, herein we wish to report a facile sonochemical synthesis of
1,5-diaryl-1,4-pentadien-3-ones catalyzed by aqueous potassium hydroxide.
2 EXPERIMENTAL
Liquid aldehydes were purified by distillation prior to use. Melting points were
uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on a Bio-Rad FTS-40 spectrometer (KBr). 1H
NMR spectra were measured on Bruker AM-400S (400 MHz) spectrometer using TMS as internal
standard and CDCl3 as solvent. Mass spectra were determined on a VG-7070E
spectrometer (EI, 70eV). Sonication was performed in a Shanghai Branson-CQX ultrasonic
cleaner with a frequency of 25 kHz and a nominal power 500W. The reaction flask was
located in the maximum energy area in the cleaner and addition or removal of water was
used to control the temperature of the water bath.
General procedure for the synthesis of
1,5-diaryl-1,4-pentadien-3-ones: A Pyrex flask (50 mL) was added 95% ethanol (4 mL),
acetone or benzalacetone (2 mmol), aromatic aldehyde (4 mmol or 2 mmol) and 1.25 mol/L
aqueous potassium hydroxide (4 mL). The mixture was irradiated in the water bath of an
ultrasonic cleaner at the temperature for the period as indicated in Table 1 (Sonication
was continued until aromatic aldehyde was disappeared indicated by TLC). After a period
time of cooling in an ice-water bath, the precipitate was isolated by suction filtration,
washed with ice-cooled 95% ethanol, cool water to neutral, dried. In most cases, the crude
products are reasonably pure. The authenticity of the products was established by
comparing their melting points with the literature and the data of IR, MS and 1H
NMR spectra.
4d: yellow platelets from ethanol£»nmax (KBr)£º3045, 3000, 1655, 1622, 1588, 1438, 1400, 1333, 1188, 1088, 977,
822 cm-1£» dH (400 MHz)£º7.05
(2H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-), 7.41 (4H, d, J=8.4 Hz, Hb),
7.57 (4H, d, J=8.4 Hz , Ha ), 7.71 (2H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-)
ppm£»m/z (%)£º304
(M+2, 10), 302 (M+,15), 267 (10), 204 (10), 165 (87), 139 (100), 101 (80),
75(85), 51(70).
4e: yellow platelets from ethanol£»nmax (KBr)£º3045, 3000, 1655, 1600, 1466, 1411, 1316, 1188, 1077, 983, 877, 800
cm-1£» dH
(400 MHz)£º 7.08 (2H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-),
7.36-7.51 (6H, m, Ha, Hb, Hc), 7.63
(2H, s, He), 7.69 (2H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-) ppm£»m/z (%)£º304 (M+2, 33), 302 (M+,50),
267 (60), 239 (18), 204 (30), 165 (54), 137 (42), 101 (100), 75(64), 63(14), 51(35).
4h: yellow platelets from ethanol£»nmax (KBr)£º3057, 3000, 1655, 1588, 1466, 1333, 1177, 1100, 977, 822, 777 cm-1£»
dH (400 MHz): 7.05 (2H,
d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-), 7.33 (2H, dd, J1=2.0Hz, J2=8.4Hz,
Hb), 7.50 (2H, d, J=2.0 Hz Hd), 7.68 (2H, d, J=8.4 Hz, Ha),
8.07 (2H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-) ppm£»m/z (%)£º374 (M+4, 10), 372 (M+2, 20), 370 (M+,15), 337 (100),
272 (12), 236 (11), 199 (21), 171 (30), 136 (66), 99 (57), 75(40), 51(70).
4i: white platelets from ethanol£»nmax (KBr)£º3079, 1688, 1633, 1600,1522, 1255, 1111, 988, 877, 822, 744 cm-1£»
dH (400 MHz)£º7.59 (2H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH- ), 7.78 (2H, t,
J=8.0Hz Hb) 7.98 (2H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-), 8.27-8.31 (4H, m, Ha,
Hc ), 8.65 (2H, s, He) ppm£»m/z (%)£º324 (M+,
30), 307(20), 277 (10), 176 (55), 129 (25), 102 (100), 76 (40), 51(40).
5b: yellow platelets from ethanol£»nmax (KBr)£º3050, 3022, 2909, 1644, 1622, 1577, 1444, 1333, 1166, 1088, 933,
811, 744 cm-1£» dH (400 MHz)£º2.42
(3H, s, -CH3), 7.07 (1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH- ), 7.11
(1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ph-CH=CH-), 7.25 (2H, d, J=8.0 Hz, Hb,
Hd), 7.44-7.65 (5H, m, Ph-H), 7.55 (2H, d, J=8.0 Hz, Ha,
He), 7.75 (1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-), 7.78 (1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ph-CH=CH-)
ppm; m/z (%)£º248 (M+,100), 233 (90), 219
(15), 205 (42), 191 (10), 170 (10), 145 (50), 131 (50), 128 (42), 115 (72), 103(92), 91
(98), 77 (95), 51 (62).
5c: yellow platelets from ethanol£»nmax (KBr)£º3045, 2954,, 2800, 1666, 1622, 1600, 1555, 1511, 1411, 1344, 1255,
1166, 1100, 988, 811, 755 cm-1£» dH (400 MHz)£º3.88
(3H, s, -CH3O), 6.96 (2H, d, J=8.8 Hz, Hb, Hd),
6.99 (1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH- ), 7.11 (1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ph-CH=CH-),
7.43-7.65 (5H, m, Ph-H), 7.60 (2H, d, J=8.8 Hz, Ha, He),
7.74 (1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-), 7.75 (1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ph-CH=CH-) ppm£»m/z (%)£º264 (M+,
68), 249 (10), 233 (20), 205 (15), 161 (35), 131 (40), 108 (50), 103 (80), 77 (100), 51
(42).
5d: yellow platelets from ethanol£»nmax (KBr)£º3045, 3022, 1655, 1622, 1588, 1488, 1333, 1188, 1088, 977, 811,
755, 688 cm-1£» dH (400 MHz)£º7.08
(1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ph-CH=CH- ), 7.09 (1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-),
7.39 (2H, d, J=9.6Hz, Hb, Hd), 7.42-7.64 (5H, m, Ph-H),
7.57 (2H, d, J=8.4Hz, Ha, He), 7.71 (1H, d, J=16 Hz,
Ph-CH=CH-), 7.76 (1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ar-CH=CH-) ppm£»m/z (%)£º270 (M+2, 34), 268 (M+,100),
233 (12), 205 (12), 165 (11), 131 (20), 103 (24), 77 (30), 51 (18).
5e: yellow platelets from ethanol£»nmax (KBr)£º3057, 3023, 1650, 1622, 1583, 1455, 1333, 1200, 1078, 922, 867,
788, 755 cm-1£» dH (400 MHz)£º 7.08
(1H, d, J=16 Hz, Ph-CH=CH- ), 7.11 (1H, d, J=16Hz, Ar-CH=CH-),
7.33-7.64 (9H, m, Ar-H, Ph-H), 7.69 (1H, d, J=16Hz, Ph-CH=CH-), 7.77
(1H, d, J=16Hz, Ar-CH=CH-) ppm£»m/z (%)£º270 (M+2, 21), 268 (M+,62), 233 (18), 205 (20), 165
(25), 131 (48), 103 (80), 77 (100), 51 (57).
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
As shown in Table 1, several aromatic aldehydes including benzaldehyde, p-chlorbenzaldehyde,
m-chlorbenzaldehyde and cinnamic aldehyde underwent clean and remarkably fast
condensation with acetone or benzalacetone under this procedure. The dramatic improvement
observed is with regard to reaction time and yields of the products. Many reactions are
completed within a period of 20 minutes. For example, in the classical reaction catalyzed
by sodium hydroxide in absolute ethanol, the products (4c) and (4f) were
obtained in 90% and 91% yield by stirring at room temperature for 10 h respectively [6],
whereas the present procedure results in 89% and 86% yield respectively at 25-30 oC
within 60 min. In the classical reaction catalyzed by the same catalyst in 95% EtOH,
compounds (4a, 4b, 4c and 4g) were obtained with 50-60%, 50-60%,
40-50% and 40-60% yields [4]. While, the present method gave the
compounds(4a, 4b, 4c and 4g) in 97%, 92%, 89% and 90% yields
respectively. We also did the experiment catalyzed by potassium hydroxide in the absence
of ultrasound, the condensation of benzaldehyde (1) with acetone (2) was
carried out in 86% (4a) yield using stirring at r.t. within 150 min. Sonication of
benzaldehyde (1) with acetone (2) gave 97% (4a) yield only for 15
min. It is apparent that the condensation of aromatic aldehydes with acetone or
benzalacetone can be finished in shorter reaction time and obtained in good yields under
ultrasound irradiation.
It is noteworthy that no corresponding products can be obtained when
the substrates are p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillin, p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde,
salicylaldehyde, p-aminobenzaldehyde and acetophenone in these experiments.
Table 1. Preparation of 1,5-diaryl-1,4-pentadien-3-one catalyzed by aqueous KOH in
95%EtOH under ultrasound irradiation.
Entry |
Ar |
t(min)/T(oC) |
Product |
Yielda,%(lit) |
mp/oC(lit) |
a |
C6H5 |
15/25-27 |
4a |
97
(50-60)4 |
113-114
(113)4 |
C6H5 |
90/25-30 |
4a |
NRb |
C6H5 |
35/25-30 |
4a |
70c |
C6H5 |
50/25-30 |
4a |
82d |
C6H5 |
40/25-30 |
4a |
84e |
C6H5 |
18/25-27 |
4a |
89f |
C6H5 |
15/25-27 |
4a |
94g |
C6H5 |
15/25-27 |
4a |
86h |
C6H5 |
150/25 |
4a |
86i |
b |
p-CH3C6H4 |
30/25-30 |
4b |
92
(50-60)4 |
176-177
(175)4 |
c |
p-CH3OC6H4 |
60/25-30 |
4c |
89
(40-50)4 (91)6 |
127-129
(129-130)4 |
d |
p-ClC6H4 |
20/25-28 |
4d |
96 |
192-194 |
e |
m-ClC6H4 |
20/25-28 |
4e |
96 |
125-126 |
f |
3,4-(OCH2O)C6H3 |
60/25-30 |
4f |
86
(90)6 |
188-189
(186-187)7 |
g |
C6H5CH=CH |
5/25-26 |
4g |
90
(40-60)4 |
142-144
(144)4 |
h |
2,4-Cl2C6H3 |
15/25-27 |
4h |
97 |
168-169 |
i |
m-NO2C6H4 |
10/25-26 |
4i |
96 |
238-240 |
j |
C6H5 |
20/25-27 |
5a |
93
(50-60)4 |
111-113
(113)4 |
k |
p-CH3C6H4 |
40/25-27 |
5b |
92 |
110-111 |
l |
P-CH3OC6H4 |
60/25-30 |
5c |
94 |
92-94 |
m |
p-ClC6H4 |
20/25-27 |
5d |
96 |
129-131 |
n |
m-ClC6H4 |
25/25-29 |
5e |
96 |
104-106 |
a Isolated
yield based on aromatic aldehydes. b The mole ratio of
KOH/benzaldehyde is 0.05.
c The mole ratio of KOH/benzaldehyde is 0.25. d The
mole ratio of KOH/benzaldehyde is 0.50.
e The mole ratio of KOH/benzaldehyde is 0.75. f The
mole ratio of KOH/benzaldehyde is 1.0.
g On 100 mmol scale.
h
The ratio of benzaldehyde/acetone is 1:1
i Using magnetic stirrer without ultrasound irradiation.
In order to
get the optimum molar ratio of KOH to benzaldehyde (1a), we studied the
condensation of benzaldehyde (1a) with acetone (2) under ultrasound
irradiation. When the molar ratio (KOH / benzaldehyde) was 0.05, the condensation did not
take place. After several experiments were performed, we found that the best molar ratio
was 1.25 to give the result of 1,5-diphenyl-1,4-pentadien-3-one (4a) in 97% yield
at 25-27 oC within 15 min. It is worth noting that the used base is much more
excessive or prolonged ultrasonication time did not increase the product yield,
conversely, resulted in polymerization of the product.
To test the selectivity of the reaction, we carried out the reaction in
ratio (benzaldehyde /acetone) of 2:1 and 1:1. Both the reaction provided the same product
(4a). Benzalacetone was not obtained.
From these results, we can deduce that the yields are, in general,
similar to or higher than those described in the literatures [4,6]. Compared
with the reported literatures, the main advantages of present procedure are milder
condition, shorter reaction period, higher yield and operational simplicity.
REFERENCES
[1] Reddy D B, Padmavathi V, Ramana Reddy P V. Indian J. Chem., 1992, 31B: 774.
[2] Hamanaka N, Nakai H, Kurono M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1980, 53: 2327.
[3] Angiolini L, Caretti D, Carlini C et al. Polymer, 1995, 36 (5): 1071.
[4] Hathaway B A. J. Chem. Edu., 1987, 64 (4): 367.
[5] Hull L A. J. Chem. Edu., 2001, 78 (2): 226.
[6] Wattanasin S, Murphy W S. Synthesis, 1980, 8: 647.
[7] Gupta R, Gupta A K, Paul S et al. Indian J. Chem.,1995, 34B: 61.
[8] (a) Luche J L. Synthetic Organic Sonochemistry, Plenum press: New York, 1998; 3-8.
(b) Li J T, Li T S, Li L J et al. Ultason. Sonochem., 1998, 5:
83.
(c) Li J T, Li L J, Li T S et al. Indian J. Chem., 1998, 37B:
298.
[9] Li J T, Chen G F, Wang J X et al. Synth. Commun., 1999, 29 (6): 965.
¡¡
|