http://www.chemistrymag.org/cji/2004/067044ne.htm

Jul. 1, 2004  Vol.6 No.7 P.44 Copyright cij17logo.gif (917 bytes)


Synthesis and crystal structure of [Cu(II)(bipy)2Cl]·NO3·3H2O

Liu He, Liu Chunhe, Zhong Bohua
(No.7 Department, Beijing Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Beijing 100850)

Abstract The title complex [Cu(II)(bipy)2Cl]·NO3·3H2O(bipy = 2,2'-bipyridine) has been synthesized and characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis. The Cu(II) center is five-coordinated and in a distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometry. The complexes form a quasi-one-dimensional structure through neighboring p-p interactions.
Keywords crystal stucture, 2,2'-bipyridine,
p-p interaction

Received May 8, 2004; Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20302015).

1 INTRODUCTION
The research on the coordination chemistry of transition metal complexes with polypyridyl bridging ligands has progressed rapidly in recent years due to their potential as building blocks for supramolecular assemblies directed by either metal coordination or other intermolecular electronic interactions[1,2]. Polypyridyl ligands such as phenanthroline and bipyridine can acted as a bridge or node to assemble multi-dimensional supramolecular architecture through polydentate ligand or aromatic ring stacking and hydrogen bonds. The complex of [Cu(II)(bipy)2Cl]- can be synthesis easily by CuCl2·2H2O and bipy in water solution. It can be as a building block to construct intricacy structures by substituting of the Cl- anions. We got the complex [Cu(II)(bipy)2Cl]·NO3·3H2O by NO3- using AgCl deposition method in the room temperature and the coordinated Cl- anion can't be substituted as a result The molecular structures of five coordinate copper(II) complexes show an extensive range from regular trigonal bipyramidal to regular square based pyramidal structure of the majority of [Cu(chelate)2X]Y complexes[3,4], the Cu(II) center of the title complex is in a distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometry.

2.EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Materials and Instruments
All the reagents for syntheses were commercially available and used without further purification or purified by standard methods prior to use. Elemental analyses were performed on a Perkin-Elmer 240C analyzer.
2.2 Preparation of the title complex
A homogenized mixture of CuCl2·2H2O(0.1mmol) and bipy(0.2mmol) accurately weighed were added into water solution. After stirring for 30 min, a solution of AgNO3 (0.1mmol)in water was added and stirring for another1h. The AgCl depositions were filtered. The blue cube crystals suitable for structure determination were obtained by slow evaporation of the solvent. Yield: 45%. Anal. Calcd for C20H22CuN5O6: C, 45.55; H, 4.20; N, 13.28. Found: C, 45.61; H, 4.26; N, 2.31.
2.3 Single crystal X-ray diffraction
The blue cube crystal was mounted on a BRUKER SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer equipped with a graphite monochromator for data collection. The determination of unit cell parameters and data collections were performed with MoKa radiation (
l = 0.71073
Å). A total of 9340 reflections with 3976 independent ones with Rint = 0.0223 and 3315 observed reflections with I > 2s (I) were collected in the range of 1.84 < q < 25.03o by an w /q scan mode at 298(2) K. All data were corrected by using SADABS method.The structure was solved by direct methods with SHELXL-97 program5. The final refinement was performed by full-matrix least-squares methods with anisotropic thermal parameters for non-hydrogen atoms on F2. Cu(II) atom in the complex was located from E-maps. The hydrogen atoms were added theoretically, riding on the concerned atoms and being refined with fixed thermal factors. The weighting scheme was w = 1/[s 2(Fo2) + (0.0710P)2+ 1.1220P], where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3. The refinement converged to the final R = 0.0393 and wR = 0.1125. S = 1.026. Molecular graphics were drawn with the program package XP. Crystallographic data and experimental details for structural analyses are summarized in Table 1. Positional parameters and atomic coordinates are given in Table 2, whereas the selected bond distances and angles are listed in Table 3, respectively. Full crystallographic details have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center and allocated the deposition number CCDC-227251.

Table 1 Crystal and experimental data

Formula: C20H22CuN5O6 Dm: 1.588 g/cm3
Formula weight: 527.24 No. of reflections used: 9340
Crystal system:

Monoclinic

2qmax: 50.06¡ã with Mo Ka
Space group: P21/n R: 0.0393
Z: 4 D/smax : 0.001
a 8.2303(10)ŠDrmax: 0.460 eŨC3
b 21.189(3) Drmin: -0.308 eŨC3
c: 13.1169(16) Measurement: BRUKER SMART 1000CCDC
b : 99.572(3) ¡ã Program system: SAINT
V: 2255.6(5) Å Structure determination: direct methods ( SHELXS-97)
Refinement: full matrix least-squares (SHELXL-97)

   

Table 2 Atomic Coordinates (¡Á104) and Equivalent Isotropic Displacement Parameters (103¡ÁÅ2)

atom

x

y

z

U(eq)

Cu(1)

7378(1)

194(1)

7454(1)

48(1)

Cl(1)

9560(1)

-77(1)

6650(1)

63(1)

N(1)

5348(3)

756(1)

6885(2)

47(1)

N(2)

5906(3)

-448(1)

6676(2)

49(1)

N(3)

7166(3)

-105(1)

8960(2)

48(1)

N(4)

8679(3)

861(1)

8278(2)

50(1)

C(1)

5152(4)

1372(2)

7034(3)

59(1)

C(2)

3750(4)

1693(2)

6616(3)

69(1)

C(3)

2517(4)

1374(2)

5997(3)

69(1)

C(4)

2694(4)

737(2)

5831(2)

57(1)

C(5)

4121(3)

435(1)

6287(2)

46(1)

C(6)

4433(3)

-244(1)

6180(2)

46(1)

C(7)

3331(4)

-657(2)

5614(2)

59(1)

C(8)

3754(5)

-1283(2)

5556(3)

68(1)

C(9)

5265(5)

-1485(2)

6048(3)

67(1)

C(10)

6312(4)

-1056(2)

6602(3)

60(1)

C(11)

9449(4)

1324(2)

7867(3)

60(1)

C(12)

10379(4)

1775(2)

8464(3)

66(1)

C(13)

10495(4)

1745(2)

9508(3)

68(1)

C(14)

9693(4)

1277(2)

9946(3)

61(1)

C(15)

8793(3)

827(1)

9313(2)

48(1)

C(16)

7934(3)

287(1)

9696(2)

48(1)

C(17)

7919(4)

173(2)

10731(3)

62(1)

C(18)

7091(4)

-345(2)

11012(3)

69(1)

C(19)

6286(4)

-740(2)

10266(3)

64(1)

C(20)

6359(4)

-604(2)

9240(3)

56(1)

N(11)

9290(6)

7463(2)

5936(3)

93(1)

O(11)

9000(8)

7728(2)

6699(5)

175(2)

O(12)

8539(7)

7058(3)

5496(5)

186(2)

O(13)

10622(7)

7633(3)

5672(6)

194(3)

O(21)

14090(6)

8071(2)

8470(4)

153(2)

O(22)

11231(7)

8603(2)

7519(3)

148(2)

O(23)

17329(6)

7556(3)

8486(4)

163(2)

U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor.

Table 3 Select bond distance (Å) and bond angles (¡ã)

Cu(1)-N(4)

1.983(2)

Cu(1)-N(3)

2.110(2)

Cu(1)-N(2)

1.987(2)

Cu(1)-Cl(1)

2.3007(9)

Cu(1)-N(1)

2.087(2)

   

   

N(4)-Cu(1)-N(2)

175.05(10)

N(1)-Cu(1)-N(3)

108.65(9)

N(4)-Cu(1)-N(1)

96.61(9)

N(4)-Cu(1)-Cl(1)

92.03(8)

N(2)-Cu(1)-N(1)

79.86(10)

N(2)-Cu(1)-Cl(1)

92.88(7)

N(4)-Cu(1)-N(3)

79.89(10)

N(1)-Cu(1)-Cl(1)

128.17(7)

N(2)-Cu(1)-N(3)

97.88(10)

N(3)-Cu(1)-Cl(1)

123.18(7)

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The ORTEP view of title complex with atom labeling is shown in Fig. 1(a). It consists of a discrete [Cu(II)(bipy)Cl]+ cation and the uncoordinated NO3- anion and H2O molecules. The Cu(II) center is coordinated by four nitrogen atoms of the two bipyridine which thus binds metal center in a bidentate fashion, and a Cl- anion. The four Cu-N bonds are appreciably different of the two ligands: with the longer bonds being 2.087(2) and 2.110(2)
Å, and the other two shorter bonds being 1.983(2) and 1.987(2)Å, respectively. The Cu-Cl distances are 2.3007(9) Å. The coordination geometry around Cu(II) can be described as a distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometry with N(4)-Cu(1)-N(2) angle of 175.05(10)¡ã occupying the axial positions. The Cu(II) center deviates by 0.007 Å from the plane defined by Cl(1), N(1) and N(3). The sum of the bond angles [Cl(1)-Cu(1)-N(1) = 128.17(7)¡ã, N(1)-Cu(1)-N(3) = 108.65(9)¡ã and N(3)-Cu(1)-Cl(1) = 123.18(7)¡ã] is 360¡ã. In this complex, the Cu(II) center is coordinated by the N-atoms of two pyridine rings forming a seven-membered chelate ring. As shown in Fig.1(b), there are the O-H···O and O-H···Cl hydrogen bonds, in which the coordinated Cl- and dissociate NO3- anions link the uncoordinated water molecules, whereas the O···O distances are in the range of 2.704-2.782 Å and O···Cl is 3.241 Å. The neighboring aromatic rings of 2,2'-bipyridine moiety between the adjacent complex are parallel to each other and separated by approximately 3.40 and 3.55Å, indicating the presence of significant face-to-face p-p stacking interactions. The p-p interactions link the complex into a quasi-one-dimensional structure.

                                   (a)                                                                                  (b)

Fig. 1 (a) The ORTEP structure of the title compound with atom labeling.
(b) Packing diagram of the title compound showing the intermolecular
p-p stacking

REFERENCES
[1] A J Blake, N R Champness, P Hubberstey et al. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 183: 117.
[2] S Leininger, B Olenyuk, P J Stang. Chem. Rev., 2000, 100: 853
.
[3] M Brophy, G Murphy, C O
'Sullivan et al. Polyhedron, 1999, 18: 611.
[4] A W Addison, R T Nageswara, J Reedijk et al. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans , 1984, 1349.
[5] G M Sheldrick, SHELXS-97, Program for X-ray Crystal Structure Solution; Göttingen University: Germany, 1997;
Sheldrick G M. SHELXL-97, Program for X-ray Crystal Structure Refinement; Göttingen University: Germany, 1997.

[ Back ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next ]