Determination of pKa
and partition coefficients of acidic organophosphorus esters in
oil-water system and substituent effects
Hu Wenxiang* Peng Qingtao
(Institute of Military Medicine, Headquarters of General Equipment, Beijing 100101 )
Received Jun. 14, 2000; Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation
of China.
Abstract The partition coefficients of
acidic organophosphorus esters in n-octane/water system were determined
spectrophotometrically via the formation of complexes with ferric thiocyanates. The
dependence of the molecular weight, steric and polar effects of substituent group of
organophosphorus esters on the partition coefficients was discussed. At the same time, the
pKa values of acidic organophosphorus esters were also determined and the
substituent effects were studied. The relationship between the concentration of the
samples and determined errors was first observed.
Keywords Acidic organophosphorus esters, Partition coefficient in oil-water system,
Substituent effects
Partition coefficient in oil-water system is
a measurment of hydrophobic and lipophilic interaction. It is important for partition
coefficient in oil-water system on the study of extraction equilibrium, velocity of
chemical reaction, ion selective electrode, vascular sclerois and so on. So the
determination and the concern study of partition coefficient in oil-water system has been
still developed continuously[1-3]. Especially, the combination way between
medicine molecular and the acceptor is mainly the non-bonded interaction, hydrophobic and
lipophilic interaction is one of the most main non-bonded interaction, therefore it is
very important for partition coefficient in oil-water system on the study of medicine
design, structure and effect relation. Hansch thought that the partition coefficient of
substance in 1-octanol/water system could be decomposed to the sum contribution of parent
and the substituent group hydrophobic constant (p).
Rokker thought that it could be decomposed to the sum contribution of every structure
element fragment constant (f) in the molecular. In n-octane/water system, p or f is decreased with the
change of substituent alkyl group from linear chain to fork isomerization in the compound.
It has not been reported how to change of that in paraffin-water system. The determination
method of partition coefficient of acidic organophosphorus esters in n-octane/water
system was studied in this paper, which determined spectrophotometrically via the
formation of complexes with ferric thiocyanates.
The pKa values of acidic organophosphorus esters is one of
the important physicochemical constants of organophosphous compounds. It is important to
study the structure effect and correlation analysis for the establishment of the
substituent effect parameters. The pKa values of acidic organophosphorus esters
were also determined and the substituent effects were studied in this paper.
1 EXPERIMENT
1.1 Determination of partition coefficient in oil-water system
1.1.1 Reagents
Ferric rhodanate solution 0.4mol/L was newly prepared: 150g Fe(NO3)3 .
9H2O and 60g NH4SCN were dissolved in 800mL water, and the
pH was adjusted to 2.9 with saturated ammonium acetate, then diluted to 1000mL. The
reagents mentioned above and CCl4 , H2SO4 were all A.R.,
HClO4 and n-octane were C.P. Ammonium acetate buffer solution and 1mol/L HClO4
solution were prepared in this lab.
1.1.2 Apparatus
751 ultra-visible spectrophotometer, pH Meter Type PHs-2 with Orzon combined
electrode, Type 232 combined electrode, Type 232 Calomel electrode and Type 231 glass
electrode, magnetic stirrer, ZD 58 motor oscillator were used for all measurements.
1.1.3 Experiment method
1.1.3.1 Determination of acidic organophosphorus esters[1]
A certain amount of sample was weighed to a 25mL volumetric bottle, and diluted to
the scale with ammonium acetate buffer solution (pH=2.9). A certain amount was taken into
a 60mL separatory funnel after vibration, and ammonium acetate buffer solution (pH=2.9)
was added in to make the volume to 10mL. 10mL ferric rhodanate solution was added, mixed,
then 6mL CCl4 was added in too. Then oscillated on the oscillator for 3 min.
The organic phase was filtered with Whatman No. IPS filter paper after the phase was
separated completely. The absorption of the organic phase was determined at 430nm on the
ultra-visible spectrophotometer with CCl4 as the blank.
1.1.3.2 Determination of distribution ratio
A certain amount of acidic organophosphorus esters was weighed to a 10mL volumetric
bottle, diluted to the scale with n-octane. Different amount of samples in n-octane
solution was taken to four separatory funnels, and made the volume to 5mL with n-octane.
15(or 30 or 45)mL 1mol/L HClO4 solution was added in, then the phase ratio was
1:3 (or 1:6 or 1:9). Oscillated the funnels on the oscillator for 1h, separated
centrifugally. 10mL water phase that had been distributed was taken in a 25mL beaker,
adjusted the solution to pH=2.9 with saturated ammonium acetate and diluted H2SO4
solution, which use pH meter with magnetic stirring. Then transfered to 60 mL separatory
funnels quantitively. The colorimetric analysis below was same as 1.3.1. The separation
ratio D = (Cin -nCaq)/ Caq. Cin was the
initial concentration of the sample, n was the reciprocal of phase ratio, Caq
was the concentration of the sample in water phase.
1.2 Determination of pKa
1.2.1 Instrument and reagents
Acid-base 636 titration apparatus, 231 glass electrode and 232 calomel standard
electrode, and all reagents were A.R. All acidic organophosphorus compounds were
synthesized by us[4].
1.2.2 Determination of pKa
0.5mmol acidic organophosphorus ester was precisely weighed to a 60mL beaker and
40mL 75% ethanol solution was added. The beaker was placed onto the acid-base 636
titration apparatus, then titrated the pKa with agitation by using 0.1mol/L
NaOH solution. 231 Glass electrode and 232 calomel standard electrode were installed on
the titration apparatus. The content of acid was calculated according to MV/W×100%. M was
molar concentration of NaOH solution, V was the consumptive volume of NaOH solution for
the end point of titration, and W was 0.5mmol which was the molar quantities of acidic
organophosphorus ester. According to the ionization equilibrium of acidic organophosphorus
esters: HLH+ + L-
pKa = -log{[H+][L-] /[HL]} = -log{
MV×MV/[W-MV]}
2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
2.1 The determination principle and results of partition coefficient of acidic
organophosphorus esters
Generally, the below formula of acidic organophosphorus esters in oil-water system
is existed[1]:
DY = Kd + 2K2 Kd2 Caq/Y (1)[1]
D is the distribution ratio,Y =1+ Ka /[H+], K2 is the dimeric constant of
organic phase, Kd is the partition coefficient in oil-water system, Ka
is the ionization constant in water phase, Caq is the total concentration of
acidic organophosphorus esters in water phase. We determined log Kd of acidic
organophosphorus esters in HClO4 solution which [H+]=1.0 mol/L, Y=1,Then the equation of
the two phase distribution in high acidity was obtained:
DY = Kd + 2K2 Kd2 Caq
(2)
According to the equation, the complexation reaction between new prepared ferric rhodanate
and acidic organophosphorus esters in water phase had been carried out, then the mixture
was extracted to CCl4 organic phase and determined with ultra-visible
spectrophotometer. The concentration of acidic organophosphorus esters in water phase Caq
could be obtained. The regression between D and Caq was conducted, the
intercept was Kd, the slope divided by 2Kd2 was K2.
The results were given in Table 1.
Table 1 The substituent group parameters and partition coefficient in oil-water
system of acidic organophosphorus esters
No. |
X |
Y |
log kd |
log k2 |
log M |
Ss I[1] |
S ESP
[1] |
1 |
CH3 |
n-C6H13O |
-1.60 |
6.70 |
2.26 |
0.29 |
1.26 |
2 |
C3H7 |
n-C6H13O |
-0.50 |
5.70 |
2.32 |
0.29 |
1.61 |
3 |
n-C4H9 |
n-C6H13O |
0.20 |
5.40 |
2.35 |
0.29 |
1.67 |
4 |
i-C4H9 |
n-C6H13O |
0.32 |
5.10 |
2.35 |
0.29 |
1.81 |
5 |
s-C4H9 |
n-C6H13O |
0.52 |
4.45 |
2.35 |
0.29 |
1.92 |
6 |
n-C5H11 |
n-C6H13O |
0.80 |
5.20 |
2.37 |
0.29 |
1.67 |
7 |
i-C5H11 |
n-C6H13O |
0.82 |
5.16 |
2.37 |
0.29 |
1.68 |
8 |
n-C8H17 |
n-C6H13O |
2.52 |
3.50 |
2.45 |
0.29 |
1.66 |
P507 |
i-C8H17 |
i-C8H17O |
3.10 |
3.30 |
2.49 |
0.29 |
2.06 |
P204 |
i-C8H17O |
i-C8H17O |
3.41 |
3.50 |
2.51 |
0.60 |
1.92 |
P507 |
|
|
2.50
2.68 |
2.20*
4.83** |
|
|
|
P204 |
|
|
3.48 |
4.53*** |
|
|
|
Notes: X and Y was respectively the two substituent group of acidic
organophosphorus esters.SsI was the induced polar
effect parameter, SESP was the
steric effect parameter that we defined, and the data were quoted from reference 1. *
was quoted from reference 5, ** was quoted from reference 6, and the two
were all in n-heptane/water system; *** was quoted from reference 7, and
was in n-octane/water system.
It should be noted that the solubility of acidic
organophosphorus esters in water phase would be decreased with the increase of the number
of the carbon atoms of the two substituent group X and Y. Otherwise, according to the
photometric analysis theory, the relative error of the determined concentration was small
comparatively as the absorbance was during 0.2-0.8. The concentration of acidic
organophosphorus esters in water phase should be increased in order to increase the
absorbance. When the total number of the carbon atom in the molecular were large
comparatively (SC>15), it was difficult for this method to
determine the partition coefficient. To avoid the unstability influence of the colour of
the molysite, the molysite solution that used all should be newly prepared, and be
colorimetric determined in the same time after the molysite had been used.
2.2 The substituent group effects of the partition coefficient in n-octane/water
system
The polybasic linear regression was carried out among log Kd (see Table
1), molecular weight M of the compound and the substituent group parameter according to
formula (3).
logKd = c + d·logM + rSsI + dSEPS
(3)
The regression coefficient could be obtained c -48.32 d 20.72 r
-0.78 d 0.097. The linear correlation coefficient r=0.997, the
relative standard error s=0.11. T-test was conducted among every regression coefficient,
and t could be obtained respectively: tc -22.31 td 18.52 tr -1.24 td 0.29. From the
above results, the molecular weight was the most main factor that influenced the partition
coefficient in oil-water system. In fact, the nine log Kd in Table 1 were taken
to the correlative analysis with the total carbon atom number in the molecular, formula
(4) could be obtained:
logKd = -5.07 + 0.53 SC (4)
r=0.99, n=9
It had been reported that with regard to (RO)2P(O)OH, formula (5) and (6) was
existed:
logKd = -5.06 + 0.59 SC (5)
logKd = -7.93 + 0.70 SC (6)
With regard to R2P(O)OH, formula (7)
was existed:
logKd = -5.51 + 0.61 SC (7)
When the carbon number in acidic organophosphorus ester molecular >16(SC of carboxylic ester >14), logKd kept stable or
decreased. It might be concerned with the cluster of long chain molecular[8].
logKd would be increased with the increase of the oxygen atoms number which
neighboured to the phosohrous atom in the molecular[9]:
R2P(O)OH R(RO)P(O)OH (RO)2P(O)OH
It revealed that logKd would be increased about 0.6 unit
with a CH2 unit increased in the molecular; and would be increased about 0.3
unit with an oxygen atom increased. The alkyl group changed from normal to isomer(a , b isomer), logKd was
decreased a little in Hansch's
1-octanol/water system; while logKd was increased a little in n-octane/water
system which we determined. Otherwise, during the course of determining the partition
coefficient in oil-water system, the dimeric constant K2 of acidic
organophosphorus esters in n-octane was obtained, and K2 was influenced by
molecular weight (M) and the substituent group effect.
logK2 = c + d.logM + rSsI
+ dSEPS (8)
And every regression coefficient was c 35.8 d -12.5 1.8 -1.0 r=0.97, s=0.26, n=10. T-test was conducted among every
regression coefficient, and t was respectively tc 7.26 td -4.92 tr 1.25 td -1.32. The
relative standard error of every regression coefficient was respectively Sc 4.9
Sd 2.5 Sr 1.4 Sd
0.8.
From the results, we can see that the error between the calculated
value and the determined value was comparatively small. It also revealed from Table 1 that
K2 was big in apolar (or low polar) solvents. It demonstrated that acidic
organophosphorus esters was existed as dimeric type in apolar(or low polar) solvents[10].
2.3 Determination deviation of pKa of acidic organophosphorus esters
Table 2 pKa values and substituent parameters of
acidic organophosphorus esters (X)(Y)P(O)OH
No |
X |
Y |
pKa |
S sI |
SESP |
D pKa |
No |
X |
Y |
pKa |
S sI |
S ESP |
D pKa |
1 |
CH3 |
n-C6H13O |
3.85 |
0.29 |
1.26 |
-0.036 |
36 |
i-C3H7 |
i-C14H29O |
4.48 |
0.29 |
2.09 |
-0.068 |
2 |
C3H7 |
n-C6H13O |
4.20 |
0.29 |
1.61 |
-0.035 |
37 |
i-C3H7 |
n-C8H17O |
4.40 |
0.29 |
1.88 |
0.019 |
3 |
i-C3H7 |
n-C6H13O |
4.47 |
0.29 |
1.88 |
0.089 |
38 |
i-C3H7 |
i-C8H17O |
4.47 |
0.29 |
2.08 |
-0.070 |
4 |
n-C4H9 |
n-C6H13O |
4.26 |
0.29 |
1.67 |
0.047 |
39 |
i-C3H7 |
s-C8H17O |
4.66 |
0.29 |
2.17 |
0.048 |
5 |
i-C4H9 |
n-C6H13O |
4.40 |
0.29 |
1.71 |
0.155 |
40 |
CH3 |
s-C8H17O |
4.10 |
0.29 |
1.75 |
-0.177 |
6 |
s-C4H9 |
n-C6H13O |
4.48 |
0.29 |
1.93 |
0.060 |
41 |
CH3 |
i-C8H17O |
3.95 |
0.29 |
1.60 |
-0.207 |
7 |
t-C4H9 |
n-C6H13O |
4.70 |
0.29 |
2.12 |
0.138 |
42 |
CH3 |
i-C16H33O |
3.98 |
0.29 |
1.48 |
-0.081 |
8 |
n-C5H11 |
n-C6H13O |
4.26 |
0.29 |
1.67 |
0.047 |
43 |
CH3 |
(C7H15)2CHO |
4.20 |
0.29 |
1.75 |
-0.077 |
9 |
i-C5H11 |
n-C6H13O |
4.27 |
0.29 |
1.68 |
0.049 |
44 |
CH3 |
(C6H13)2CHO |
4.20 |
0.29 |
1.75 |
-0.077 |
10 |
n-C8H17 |
n-C6H13O |
4.25 |
0.29 |
1.66 |
0.045 |
45 |
CH3 |
(C8H17)2CHO |
4.20 |
0.29 |
1.75 |
-0.077 |
11 |
i-C8H17 |
n-C6H13O |
4.45 |
0.29 |
1.86 |
0.085 |
46 |
CH3 |
i-C14H29O |
3.98 |
0.29 |
1.48 |
-0.081 |
12 |
s-C8H17 |
n-C6H13O |
4.60 |
0.29 |
2.01 |
0.116 |
47 |
CH3 |
i-C18H37O |
3.95 |
0.29 |
1.48 |
-0.111 |
13 |
n-C8H17 |
n-C8H17O |
4.21 |
0.29 |
1.66 |
0.005 |
48 |
n-C8H17 |
n-C8H17 |
5.30 |
-0.02 |
1.80 |
0.022 |
14 |
n-C8H17 |
i-C8H17O |
4.31 |
0.29 |
1.86 |
-0.055 |
49 |
i-C8H17 |
i-C8H17 |
5.45 |
-0.02 |
2.20 |
0.147 |
15 |
n-C8H17 |
s-C8H17O |
4.54 |
0.29 |
1.95 |
0.104 |
50 |
s-C8H17 |
s-C8H17 |
5.85 |
-0.02 |
2.50 |
0.014 |
16 |
i-C8H17 |
n-C8H17O |
4.33 |
0.29 |
1.86 |
-0.035 |
51 |
n-C8H17O |
n-C8H17O |
3.05 |
0.60 |
1.52 |
-0.082 |
17 |
i-C8H17 |
i-C8H17O |
4.50 |
0.29 |
2.06 |
-0.024 |
52 |
i-C8H17O |
i-C8H17O |
3.35 |
0.60 |
1.92 |
-0.102 |
18 |
n-C8H17 |
s-C8H17O |
4.65 |
0.29 |
2.15 |
-0.014 |
53 |
s-C8H17O |
s-C8H17O |
3.75 |
0.60 |
2.10 |
0.155 |
19 |
s-C8H17 |
n-C8H17O |
4.50 |
0.29 |
2.01 |
0.016 |
54 |
cyc-C6H11 |
n-C8H17O |
4.40 |
0.29 |
1.83 |
0.059 |
20 |
s-C8H17 |
i-C8H17O |
4.55 |
0.29 |
2.21 |
-0.094 |
55 |
cyc-C6H11 |
i-C8H17O |
4.55 |
0.29 |
2.03 |
0.050 |
21 |
s-C8H17 |
s-C8H17O |
4.80 |
0.29 |
2.30 |
0.084 |
56 |
cyc-C6H11 |
s-C8H17O |
4.75 |
0.29 |
2.12 |
0.178 |
22 |
n-C8H17 |
n-C4H9O |
4.20 |
0.29 |
1.67 |
-0.013 |
57 |
C6H5 |
n-C8H17O |
3.43 |
0.42 |
1.30 |
-0.085 |
23 |
n-C8H17 |
i-C4H9O |
4.30 |
0.29 |
1.81 |
-0.025 |
58 |
C6H5 |
i-C8H17O |
3.53 |
0.42 |
1.50 |
-0.144 |
24 |
n-C8H17 |
s-C4H9O |
4.50 |
0.29 |
1.92 |
0.088 |
59 |
C6H5 |
s-C8H17O |
3.70 |
0.42 |
1.65 |
-0.094 |
25 |
i-C8H17 |
n-C4H9O |
4.30 |
0.29 |
1.87 |
-0.073 |
60 |
o-CH3C6H4 |
n-C8H17O |
3.60 |
0.41 |
1.20 |
0.134 |
26 |
i-C8H17 |
i-C4H9O |
4.40 |
0.29 |
2.01 |
-0.084 |
61 |
o-CH3C6H4 |
i-C8H17O |
3.68 |
0.41 |
1.41 |
0.096 |
27 |
i-C8H17 |
s-C4H9O |
4060 |
0.29 |
2.12 |
0.028 |
62 |
C6H5 |
n-C6H13O |
3.43 |
0.42 |
1.16 |
0.027 |
28 |
s-C8H17 |
n-C4H9O |
4.31 |
0.29 |
2.02 |
-0.182 |
63 |
p-CH3C6H4 |
n-C6H13O |
3.51 |
0.40 |
1.16 |
0.045 |
29 |
s-C8H17 |
i-C4H9O |
4.55 |
0.29 |
2.16 |
0.054 |
64 |
p-C2H5C6H4 |
n-C6H13O |
3.54 |
0.40 |
1.16 |
0.075 |
30 |
s-C8H17 |
s-C4H9O |
4.71 |
0.29 |
2.34 |
0.042 |
65 |
p-iC3H7C6H4 |
n-C6H13O |
3.53 |
0.40 |
1.16 |
.0.065 |
31 |
i-C8H17 |
i-C6H13O |
4.40 |
0.29 |
2.06 |
-0.124 |
66 |
p-C4H9C6H4 |
n-C6H13O |
3.53 |
0.40 |
1.16 |
0.065 |
32 |
n-C8H17 |
i-C6H13O |
4.30 |
0.29 |
1.86 |
-0.065 |
67 |
p-iC4H9C6H4 |
n-C6H13O |
3.53 |
0.40 |
1.16 |
0.065 |
33 |
i-C3H7 |
i-C12H25O |
4.40 |
0.29 |
1.88 |
0.011 |
68 |
p-tC4H9C6H4 |
n-C6H13O |
3.54 |
0.40 |
1.16 |
0.075 |
34 |
i-C3H7 |
s-C13H27O |
4.65 |
0.29 |
2.37 |
-0.122 |
69 |
t-C4H9 |
t-C4H9 |
6.09 |
-0.02 |
2.72 |
0.070 |
35 |
i-C3H7 |
s-s-C13H27O |
4.85 |
0.29 |
2.48 |
-0.093 |
70 |
t-C5H11 |
t-C5H11 |
6.26 |
-0.02 |
2.72 |
0.188 |
Note: X and Y was two substituent group of acidic
organophosphorus esters respectively. DpKa = pKa(Found)- pKa(Calcd.)
The determination results of pKa of
acidic organophosphorus esters are given in Table 2. The molar quantity of samples must be
controlled to near equally during the course of determination. We observed first that the
bigger the consumptive weight of the same sample, the smaller the pKa was. In
order to prove the truth of this phenomenon, we used 0.101mol/L NaOH solution titrated the
standard sample benzoic acid in 40mL 75% ethanol. The determination results are given in
Table 3.
Table 3 pKa of benzoic acid
No |
weight of sample (mg) |
Concentration (C, mol/L) |
|
pKa |
1 |
38.5 |
0.007875 |
0.0887 |
6.43 |
2 |
83.6 |
0.01713 |
0.1309 |
6.35 |
3 |
107.1 |
0.02193 |
0.1481 |
6.26 |
4 |
163.1 |
0.03340 |
0.1828 |
6.18 |
5 |
210.4 |
0.04308 |
0.2076 |
6.08 |
This was consistant with the phenomenon we observed.
The data in Table 2 were monobasic linear regressed and the better linear relation could
be obtained between pKa and the square root of sample concentration:
pKa = 6.71- 2.95
(9)
And the correlation coefficient r was -0.9897( n=5). It might be explained by the ionic
activity coefficient.
Generally speaking, ionization equilibrium constant pKaa
expressed by activity does not change with the concentration, and pKa what we
determined by 636 automaticall titration apparatus was pKac that
expressed by concentration. So the equation (10) was existed:
pKaa = log { aHL / aHaL } =
log {rHL.[HL] / rHrL .[H][L]}= log
{ rHL / rH rL }
+ log {[HL]/ [H][L]} = pKac
- log (rH rL) (10)
In which, the acitivity coefficient of neutral molecule HL rHL=1 .
According to the Debye-Hückel theory of electrolyte dilute solution,
we have the following formula:
(11)
In which, ri was average activity coefficient of ion, I was ionic strength I=
1/2 SmiZi2, which was
controlled by the consumptive quantity of strong base. Although ionic strength I was
changenable during the course of titration, its average value could be obtained. Ionic
strength I was consistant with the initial concentration near the end point of the
titration, so the relation of (11) was established. Taken formula (11) into formula (10)
and formula (12) was obtained:
pKac = pKaa - a (12)
That formula (12) we obtained was consistant with formula (9) obtained by experiment. It
revealed that Debye-Hückel theory also applied to ethanol-water solution system in a
certain extent.
pKa changed with the consumptive weight of sample, the determination absolute
error of pKa was about ±0.05 if the consumptive weight of sample was
controlled among 0.4-0.6mmol, and was about ±0.025 if that was in 0.1mmol.
2.4 Substituent effects on pKa
Many scholars put forward the experience formulas of pKa , the
base of these formulas was the contribution of the substituent polar effect which led to
the change of pKa. Actually, the reverse reaction of acid disassociation was
hydrated proton combined with acid group anion. Although the direct steric hindrance
effect was not clear, because it was important for solvation to the stability of anion so
that influenced ionization equilibrium, and thus influenced the values of pKa .
Therefore we put forward the solvated steric effect parameter Esp of
organophosphorus compounds[11]. In general condition, pKa could be
expressed as (13) that be influenced by substituent polar and solvated steric effects in
the molecule.
pKa = c +rSsI + dSEPS
(13)
SsI was induction polar effect parameter. The data
in Table 2 were polybasic linear regressed according to formula (13), and the better
related result was obtained: linear coefficient r=0.987 and relative standard deviation
s=0.089(n=70). Every regression coefficient were c
3.78, r -3.10, d 0.80. Relative
standard deviation of every regression coefficient were Sc 0.085, Sr 0.115, Sd 0.033. Put
every regression coefficient to t-test and t values could be obtained tc 44.73,
tr -26.97, td
23.81.
Generally, the error between pKa
which calculated by formula (13) and which determined by experiment was < 0.1. It demonstrated that this formula reflected
substituent effcet of pKa sufficiently. That is to say , electron withdrawing
group substitution led to decrease of pKa and increase of acidity. Increase of
substituent group steric effect led to increase of pKa and decrease of acidity.
REFERENCES
[1] Hu W X. [Thesis for the Doctorate]. Shanghai: Shanghai Institute of Organic
Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science; Beijing Library ,1989:166-170.
[2] Fujita T. Progr. Phys. Org. Chem., 1983, 14: 75-86.
[3] Leo A, Hansch C, Elkins D. Chem. Rev., 1971, 71: 525-537.
[4] Mastryukova T A, Kabachnik M I. J. Org .Chem., 1971, 36 (9): 1201-1216.
[5] Li D Q, Xu F W, Pan C W. Wuhan University Journal, 1983, 2: 74-79.
[6] Li B G, Li J R, Cui L F. Chem. Reagent., 1984, 6 (3): 129-134.
[7] Yuauol B C, Clupugola P A. Paguoxuua, 1970, 12: 47-60.
[8] Jiang X K. Chem. Journal, 1984, 42: 1276-1284.
[9] Kolarik Z. Solvent Extraction Reviews. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1971, 1: 36-38.
[10] Yuan C Y, Ye W Z, Ma H L et al. Chin. Sci (B)., 1982, 25: 7-13.
[11] Yuan C Y, Li S, Hu W X et al. Heteroatom Chem, 1993, 4 (1): 23-31.
|