An "i-4, i, i+4"
"reductive and nucleophilic zipper" shared by both prion protein and
beta-amyloid peptide sequences supports a common putative molecular mechanism
Yang Chiming (Chi Ming Yang)
(Neurochemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, Nankai
University, Tian Jin 300071; Institute for Life Sci & Health, La Jolla (San Diego),
California 92039-2035; College of Life Science & Biotechnology, Shanghai JiaoTong
University, Shanghai 200030, China )
Received Apr. 21, 2000
Abstract To understand the protein
molecular basis of genetic diseases, a hitherto undescribed "i-4, i, i+4"
reductive, basic and nucleophilic zipper, XAXXXBXXXAX, evolved in
natural protein sequences is investigated. A physical chemistry-based computer Algorithm
allowed a protein sequence comparative study which argues that a His (i - 4)
/ Trp (i) / His (i+4) zipper in prion protein sequence
and a His (i - 4) / Tyr (i) / His (i+4)
zipper in beta-amyloid peptide sequence supports a common putative molecular mechanism in
the sporadic forms of related neurodegeneative diseases. A similar "i-4, i, i+4"
zipper is also identified from the active sites of a variety of copper(II)-dependent
oxidases (as Trp(i-4)/His(i)/Tyr( i+4)
zipper) used by aerobic bacteria for the respiration of dioxygen. It is suggested that an
alignment of "i-4, i, i+4" triple or more oxidixable (reductive) and
nucleophilic amino-acid residues may be crucial in the oxidative damage to both amyloid
precursor protein (APP) and prion proteins in the initial stages of free-radical-based
pathogenesis in Alzheimer's disease, and both sporadic and genetic forms of prion
diseases. This type of zippers, H/Y/H, H/W/H, and W/H/Y, fully illustrate why octarepeats,
i.e., 8 amino-acid residues in each peptide repeat, are evolved in prion proteins. The
Gibbs free-energy change associated with the amyloid process may be expressed by the
equation: delta G (amyloidosis) = delta G10
(mutation)+ [delta G2a ("i-4, i, i+4"
basicity/nucleophilicity) + delta G2b ("i-4, i, i+4"
reductivity) +......]
Keywords "i-4, i, i+4" "reductive,
basic and nucleophilic zipper ", His (i) / Trp (i+4) or Tyr (i+4), beta-amyloid
peptide, oxidative damage, genetic diseases, oxidase
Abbreviations APP, amyloid precursor protein; AD, Alzheimer's disease; PrP,
prion protein
Alzheimer's disease (AD)[1,2] is a
widespread progressive dementia happen in the elderly and its high death incidence is just
next to cardiovascular disease and cancer in the developed world. The presence of
non-crystalline, non-homogeneous and protease-resistant but ordered protein aggregate in
the brains of patients is the predominant feature of AD[2]. This protein
aggregate is composed largely of a hydrophobic 39-43 amino acid peptide called
beta-amyloid peptide[3], the sequence of which is encoded in the amyloid
precursor protein (APP) gene. Another neurodegenerative disorder, prion diseases, which
occur as three types of incidences, i.e., sporadic, genetic and infectious, is
characterized by the accumulation in the brain of an apparently similar type of
protease-resistant and multimeric protein plaques[4-7]. While prion disease can
be transmissible by the infectious prion aggregates, AD is not transmissible[4,5].
This is presumably because that the beta-amyloid peptide in AD is a small peptide composed
of only about 42 amino-acid residues, but prion protein is a biomacromolecule with 254
amino-acid residues which may be able to confer sequence-specific biomolecular recognition
ability[4].
Unfortunately the molecular mechanisms of these two neurodegenerative
disorders have been in controversy for many decades[4-11]. Although a free
radical mechanism in AD was proposed years ago[9,10], it was only until very
recently that a sequence-specific protein radical mechanism for prion diseases had been
eventually suggested from this lab[4,12-15] and it has since received much
attention duo to the disturbance of epidemic mad cow disease. Using bioinformative
approaches to investigating sequence determinants of amyloidogenic proteins[16],
and the pathological and biological features of the neurodegenerative disorders, we were
forced to have suggested that prion disease is initiated by both oxygen-containing
free-radical damage and sequence-specific protein radicals, and disease propagation is
facilitated by both sequence-specific prion radicals and reactive oxidative species in
mammals[4,12-15].
To provide a protein molecular basis for
the two neurodegenerative disorders with similar but not identical pathological features,
in the present study a computational analysis of the sequences of benign primate prion
protein, which are encoded in piron gene, and the sequence of amyloid peptide 1-42, which
is encoded in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene, revealed a common "i-4, i,
i+4" "reductive, basic and nucleophilic zipper", suggesting a common
putative mechanism underlying the initiation stages of sporadic Alzheimer's disease and
both sporadic and genetic forms of prion diseases.
1 METHODS AND RESULTS
1.1 Thermodynamic consideration and theoretical basis of Algorithm for amyloid protein
sequence analysis
Since prion concept was arguably proposed by Prusiner[7], protein misfolding
(or amyloid formation) has been an unclear subject in protein biochemistry and biophysics.
Here I use the term "amyloidosis" to describe the collective phenomenon:
amyloidosis, misfolding or aggregation of a protein. Assuming that amyloid formation is
resulted from both destabilized folding upon single-point mutation and
microenvironment-induced protein aggregation, we have the following Gibbs energy equation,
delta G (amyloidosis) = delta G10 + delta
G2 = delta G10 + [ delta G2a + delta
G2b +......] = delta G10 (mutation)+
[delta G2a ("i-4, i, i+4" basicity/nucleophilicity) + delta
G2b ("i-4, i, i+4" reductivity) + ......]
(a)
where, deltaG10 is Gibbs free energy associated with
destabilized folding upon single-point mutation; deltaG2 is Gibbs free
energy associated with microenviroment-associated chemistry-affected protein aggregation; deltaG2a
is Gibbs free energy associated with cooperative "i-4, i, i+4"
basicity/nucleophilicity-affected protein aggregation; deltaG2b is Gibbs
free energy associated with "i-4, i, i+4" cooperative oxidative-reductive
protein aggregation. Based on equation (a), a computer Algorithm is written to
analyse the available amyloid protein sequences.
Earlier reports demonstrated that the poly octarepeats in the prion
protein molecules bind selectively with copper(II) ions, and it was postulated that Trp
and His were the possible chelating residues and one Cu(II) ion presumably binds with two
octarepeats (PHGGGWGQ) in prion proteins[17]. Meanwhile, amyloid precursor
protein (APP) also exhibits high affinity for Cu(II), which leads to reduction of Cu(II)
to Cu(I), and APP undergoes a site-specific fragmentation in the reduction of hydrogen
peroxide[18,19]. However, the chemistry, especially the oxidative chemistry of
this type of peptide sequences remains largely unexplored, although in a recent report it
was postulated that beta-amyloid peptide directly produced hydrogen peroxide from its
reaction with metal ions[20].
Whilst in the life-science research horizon, proteogenic amino acids
histidine, tryptophan and tyrosine containing heterocyclic aromatic side-chains have been
demonstrated to be highly reductive (oxidizable ) residues[21-23] towards
reactive oxidative species, and they are basic and nucleophilic, being capable of reacting
with a wide variety of electron-deficit species. The imidazol, indole, and phenol rings of
histidine, tryptophan and tyrosine residues, respectively, are among the most susceptible
side chains to free radical attack initiated by Fenton-type reactions. It can be suggested
that the side chains of these residues may not only play a structural role in binding
small ligands such as copper(II) ions, but also be prone to free radical damage by
oxygen-containing radicals including the notorious hydroxyl radicals. In order to
investigate the molecular basis of neurodegenerative disorders including prion diseases
and AD, computer-assisted biochemistry-based comprehensive search was made for sequence
similarity between APP, prion protein and other related protein sequences in nature. It
can be shown both of these disease-associated proteins, APP and prion protein, maintain
"i-4, i, i+4" triple or multiple reductive/nucleophilic amino-acid residues in
the N-terminal domains, i.e., "Raa-X-X-X-Raa-X-X-X-Raa" motif. Here each "Raa"
denotes a reductive/nucleophilic amino-acid residue such Trp, Tyr or His.
1.2 Zipper sequence of amyloid peptide A(beta)-42 and A(beta)-40
Amyloid peptide sequence has been characterized for many years[3,24], but its
chemistry has been poorly understood. Its sequence is shown as follows:
DAEFR Hi-4DSGY i EVHH
i+4Q KLVFF AEDVG SNKGA IIGLM VGGVV IA
So far at least four genes (beta-APP mutations, apoE4 polymorphism,
Presenilin 1 mutations and Presenilin 2 mutations) have been implicated in AD pathogenesis[1,2],
and accumulation of amyloid peptide plaques A(beta)-42 and A(beta)-40 has been observed in
the brains of affected patients[2,9,10]. Yet a detailed mechanism how and why
the amyloid plaque is formed has never been clearly elucidated. This peptide was
repeatedly demonstrated to be neuro-toxic in vitro and numerous reports provide evidence
that nitrogen-containing heterocyclic aromatic compounds including nicotine are able to
delay the amyloid aggregation process[25,26]. Besides, tremendous amount of
biological data from an oxidative stress theory-favoured camp supports a free radical
molecular mechanism in AD pathogenesis[27-33]. Nevertheless, since others often
feel that only little in-depth insight into the free radical mechanism on a molecular
basis has been available, a seemingly appealing view from protein misfolding-favoured club
prefer claiming a "nucleation" or "seeding" model in interpreting the
AD at a molecular level[11,34].
1.3 Zipper sequences in prion proteins
The central event in prion diseases is the structural transformation of
a single protein, i.e., prion protein, from its benign form to its diseased and infectious
form[4-8]. Prion gene encoding the benign prion protein (PrP) has been found
from all the mammals so far examined[4-8]. Its essentially requirement in the
development of prion disease has been demonstrated by many transgenic mice experiments
which showed that ablation of prion gene abolished the disease infection[5-7].
It is revealed that the poly octarepeats in the N-terminal domain and the two hydrophobic
segments in the C-terminal domain are found to be highly conserved among all the
vertebrates[5-7]. Characteristic parts of the sequence of the benign prion
protein are as follows:
PQGGGGW57GQ(PH i-4GGGW iGQ)
(PH i+4GGGWGQ)3..(A113GAAAAGAVVGGLGG
Y)
......(L234FSSPPVILLISFLIFLIVG) [human numbering]
Laboratory animal experiments indicated that polyoctapeptide repeats at
the N-terminus of benign PrP play an important role in the aetiology of the diseases,
since it is found that normal goats with four copies of octarepeats (PHGGGWGQ) are very
susceptible to scrapie infection, but transgenic goats with 2 copies of the octarepeats
are non-pathogenic. Meanwhile, expansion of this octarepeats was found to be associated
with familial (genetic) human prion disease. For example, familial human prion disease
patients have from 5 up to 8 extra octarepeats of (PHGGGWGQ) in their PrP sequence,
compared with four octarepeats at the N-terminus encoded in prion genes for normal humans[4].
Other investigation provides firm evidence which indicates that His
residues in scrapie PrP protein may plays a crucial role in the sequence specificity of
prions infectivity, for the infectious scrapie agent is inactivated by treatment with
diethylpyrocarbonate, which carboxyethylates the His residues of prion proteins.
Interestingly, the infectivity of diethylpyrocarbonate-inactivated scrapie agent is
restored by treatment with hydroxylamine[35]. Besides, polyamines and
nitrogen-containing compounds such as Congo red are also found to inhibit scrapie protein
infection[15,36], and copper ion dramatically affected the reversibility of
scrapie prion inactivation[37].
1.4 Zipper sequences in Cytochrome c oxidases
Cytochrome c oxidase [EC.1.9.3.1] is an important enzyme used by aerobic bacteria for the
respiration of dioxygen [35,38,39]. This copper-dependent enzyme is located in
the inner membrane of mitochondria in eucaryotes and in the plasma membrane of aerobic
bacteria. It catalyzes the reduction of dioxygen. Active site of the copper-dependent
enzyme cytochrome-c oxidases are shown in the following for comparison of membrane helix
VI amino acid sequences withTrp 236, His240 and Tyr244 of subunits I from four cytochrome
c oxidases. Bovine heart aa3-oxidase (Bh aa3); P. denitrificans aa3-oxidase (Pd aa3); T.
thermophilus caa3-oxidase (Tt caa3); T. thermophilus ba3-oxidase (Tt ba3)[40].
Bh aa3 D227PILYQHLFWi-4 FFGHi
PEVYi+4IL ILPGFGMISH IVTYYSGKKE PFGY270
Pd aa3 D227PVLYQHILWi-4 FFGH
i PEVY i+4IL ILPGFGIISH VISTFAKKPI FGY270
Tt caa3 D227PVLFQQFFWi-4 FYSHi
PTVYi+4VM LLPYLGILAE VASTFARKPL FGY270
Tt ba3 D227PLVARTLFWi-4 WTGHi
PIVYi+4FM LLPAYAIIYT ILPKQAGGKL VSDP270
The –Trp-X-X-X-His-X-X-X-Tyr- motif in the sequence alignments
is present in all cytochrome c and quinol oxidases of eucaryotes (mitochondria),
eubacteria and archaea. It was previously postulated that this type of evolution may be to
prevent the release of superoxide anion radical O2-· , the peroxide anion O22-
and especially the dangerous hydroxyl radical · OH from the peroxide split[38].
2 DISCUSSION AND OUTLOOKS
A reductive/nucleophilic zipper formed by "i-4, i, i+4" triple or more
reductive amino-acid residues has been found in the essential peptide segments in both APP
and prion protein sequences. Since the molecular mechanisms of both Alzheimer's disease
and prion diseases have been proposed to be presumably associated with oxygen-containing
free-radical damage to these proteins, the biochemical delineation of the reductive zipper
further suggests and supports the conceptual idea that a common putative protein-radical
chemistry-based mechanism likely underlie the initiation of Alzheimer's disease and both
sporadic and genetic forms of prion diseases.
It is known that the N-terminus of prion proteins containing poly octarepeat
is highly flexible and disordered in vitro[41], and secondary structure is
formed upon its binding to copper(II) ion [17]. In a molten globular state of a
protein, i.e., the widely believed folding intermediate towards the folded
three-dimensional structure of the protein, the structural state being close to the folded
state, the side chains at positions of i-4, i and i+4 shall reside in the closest spatial
proximity with each other along the polypeptide chain. Therefore, the alignment of
multiple i-4, i and i+4 reductive side-chains shall have been conceivably evolved by
nature to be ready to bind with small ligands including the oxidative copper (II) ion (See
Figure 1) and oxygen-containing free radicals. This uniformly existed "i-4, i, i+4"
zipper is consistent with the well-known structural characteristic of an alpha-helical
structure in both the folded and molten globular states of a polypeptide chain, whereby
the number of amino-acid residues per normal alpha-helical turn is 3.6 (and 3.5 residues
per turn for coiled-coil structures of coiled-coil polypeptides), and the distance between
each pair of side-chains of "i, i+4" positions is about 4 x 1.5 angstroms = 6.0
angstroms. Hence, both structural and biochemical requirement for polypeptide-chain
binding to small ligands are met by this unique alignment (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Molten globular
state in the alignment of multiple i-4, i and i+4 reductive amino-acid residues in binding
with small ligands including copper ion (II). Here Raa denotes reductive amino-acid
residues.
Of particular interesting
is that an essentially similar zipper is also located at the active sites of many
copper-dependent oxidases which catalyse electron-transfer-based oxygen respiration.
Hence, the "i-4, i, i+4" multiple His and Trp/Tyr zipper may be a universal
structural motif as a binding domain for copper ion (II). Meanwhile, it may imply that the
amino-acid sequence of a protein not only encodes the three-dimensional structure of the
protein, but also encodes sequence-dependent and microenvironment-associated oxidative
chemistry property of the protein molecule[42]. In addition, the "i-4, i,
i+4" reductive zipper fully explain why octarepeats, i.e., 8 residues in each repeat,
are evolved in mammalian prion protein sequence.
Knowledge about oxidative protein free-radical biochemistry including
tryptophan radicals in cytochrome c oxidases has been rapidly accumulating[11-15,20-23,27-30,43-47],
and protein free-radical mechanism has been implicated in a wide variety of biological
consequences including disease processes. Polar zipper sequences such as poly-glutamines
sequence have been previously identified to be implicated in neurodegenerative Huntington's
disease[48], and poly-glutamine zipper in oligopeptide repeats - PQGGYQQYN
was found to be crucial for spontaneous conformational conversion of yeast protein Sup35[49],
although the "i, i+4" Gln zipper (non-reductive zipper) may imply a different
molecular mechanism in "yeast prion". In contrast, the reductive zipper "i-4,
i, i+4" discussed here shall greatly facilitate better understanding into both the
biochemical and biophysical aspects of protein participation in biological events,
especially the molecular basis of genetic diseases in the brains of mammals which require
oxygen. Recall that physiological function of a benign prion protein in mammals still
remains unknown[50,51], here the precise delineation of a distinct "i-4,
i, i+4" reductive zipper shared by both prion protein and copper(II)-dependent
oxidases may shed new light on future effort in elucidating what special task the prion
protein molecule does. It is anticipated that a recognition of distinctive sequence of
amyloid proteins shall provide guidelines for applying protein engineering and genetic
engineering technique in the development of pharmaceutically valuable protein molecules in
the treatment of related neurodegenerative disorders.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by MOST of China and Nankai University. I thank my
student Li Wei for assistance.
REFERENCES
[1] Selkoe D J. Science, 1997, 275: 630-631.
[2] Hardy J, Gwinn-Hardy K. Science, 1998, 282: 1075-1079.
[3] Glenner G G, Wong C W. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1984, 122: 1131-1135.
[4] Yang C M. Chemistry Online (Huaxue Tongbao), 1999, (13): 86. (http://www.chemistrymag.org/col/1999/c99086.htm)
[5] Chesebro B. Science, 1998, 279: 42-43.
[6] Weissmann C. FEBS Lett., 1996, 389: 3-11.
[7] Prusiner S B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1998, 95: 13363-13383.
[8] Yang C M, Chen Y. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45: 285-289.
[9] Butterfield D A. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 1997, 10: 495-506.
[10] Naiki H, Hasegawa K, Yamaguchi I et al. Biochemistry, 1998, 37: 17882-17889.
[11] Jarrett J T, Lansbury P T. Cell, 1993, 73: 1053-1058.
[12] Yang C M. Chemical J. Internet, 1999, 1 (1), 6. (http://www.chemistrymag.org/cji/1999/011006le.htm)
[13] Ye X H. Science and Technology Daily (Keji Ribao), 1999, Oct. 21.
[14] Yang C M, Chen Y. Chemistry (Huaxue Tongbao), 2000, 63 (1), 6063.
[15] Yang C M. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45: 1546-1554.
[16] Yang C M. Thirteenth Symposium of the Protein Society, Boston, July 24-28, 1999 and
the Third European Symposium of the Protein Society, Sep.19-22, 1999,
Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
[17] Stöckel J, Safar J, Wallace A C et al. Biochemistry, 1998, 37: 7185-7193.
[18] Multhaup G, Schlicksupp A, Hesse L et al. Science, 1996, 271: 1406-1409.
[19] Multhaup G, Ruppert T, Schlicksupp A et al. Biochemistry, 1998, 37: 7224-7230.
[20] Huang X, Atwood C, Hartshorn M A et al. Biochemistry, 1999, May 27 ASAP web release.
[21] Davies K J A, Delsignore M E, Lin S W. J. Biol. Chem., 1987, 262: 9902-9907.
[22] Stadtman E R. Science, 1992, 257: 1220-1224.
[23] Stubbe J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1998, 95: 2723.
[24] Selkoe D J. J. Biol. Chem., 1996, 271: 18295-18298.
[25] Salomon A R, Marcinowski K J, Friedland R P, Zagorski M G. Biochemistry, 1996, 35:
13568-13578.
[26] Lorenzo A, Yankner B A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1994, 91: 12243-12247.
[27] Butterfield D A, Howard B J, Yatin S et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1997, 94:
674-678.
[28] Manelli A M, Puttfarcken P S. Brain Res. Bull., 1995, 38: 569-576.
[29] Subramaniam R, Howard B J, Hensley K et al. Alzheimer's Res., 1995, 1: 141-144.
[30] Sayre L M, Zagorski M G, Surewicz W K et al. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 1997,
10: 518-526.
[31] Butterfield D A. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 1997, 10: 495-506.
[32] Pike C J, Burdick D, Walencewicz A J et al. J. Neurosci., 1993, 13: 1676-1687.
[33] Esler W P, Stimson E R, Ghilardi J R et al. Biochemistry, 1996, 35: 749-757.
[34] Costa P R, Kocisko D A, Sun B Q et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119: 10487-10493.
[35] Voet D, Voet J G. Biochemistry. John Wiley & Son, Inc., 1995, 1026-1028.
[36] Supattapone S, Nguyen H O B, Cohen F E et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96:
14529-14534.
[37] McKenzie D, Bartz J, Mirwald J et al. J. Biol. Chem., 1998, 273: 25545-25547.
[38] Ferguson-Miller S, Babcock G T. Chem. Rev., 1996, 96: 2889-2907.
[39] Musser S M, Chan S I. Mol. Evol., 1998, 46: 508-520.
[40] Buse G, Soulimane T, Dewor M et al. Protein Science, 1999, 8: 985-990.
[41] Donne D G, Viles J H, Groth D et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 1997, 94:
13452-13457.
[42] Yang C M, Protein chemical biology in prion diseases and BSE, invited colloquium on
the opening ceremony of Bio-X center in the Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2000, China.
[43] Smith C D, Carney J M, Tatsumo T et al. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1992, 663: 110-119.
[44] Starke-Reed P E, Oliver C N. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1989, 275: 559-567.
[45] Smith C D, Carney J M, Starke-Reed P E et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1991,
88: 10540-10543.
[46] Rigby S E J, Jünemann S, Rich P R, Heathcote P. Biochemistry, 2000, ASAP Article
[47] Goodin E B. J. Phy. Chem. B, 1998, 102: 8221-8228.
[48] Perutz M F, Johnson T, Suzuki M, Finch J T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1994, 91:
5355-5358.
[49] Liu J J, Lindquist S. Nature, 1999, 400: 573-576.
[50] Brown D R, Besinger A. Biochem. J., 1998, 334: 423-429.
[51] Glockshuber R, Hornemann S, Billeter M et al. FEBS Letters, 1998, 426: 291-296.
|