http://www.chemistrymag.org/cji/2001/032009ne.htm

  Feb. 21, 2001  Vol.3 No.2 P.9 Copyright cij17logo.gif (917 bytes)


Substituent effect on UV spectra of 5-arylmethylenerhodanines

Sun Jing, Jiang Yanming, Yan Chaoguo
(Department of Chemistry, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002)

Received  Jun. 15, 2000.

Abstract  With potassium fluoride supported on alumina as solid catalyst, rhodanine 1 (2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone) reacted with aromatic aldehydes 2a-e in refluxing methanol to give 5-arylmethylenerdonines 3a-e in high yields. The UV spectra of 3a-e in seventeen solvents were measured, and the maximum absorption frequency shows good correlation with the Hammett's substituent cofficients.
Keywords rhodanine, catalyzed synthesis, UV spectra, substituent effect.

The interesting relationship of the electronic spectra with the structure of organic molecules as well as with the environment has been attracted more and more attention. Although there are a lot of qualitative and quantitative theory and rules in this fields, the limitation and drawback were disturbed in application[1-3], which can only be solved by more research and data on UV spectra of different types of organic compounds.
    We have synthesized 5-arylmethylenerdonines 3a-e by using KF-Al2O3 as solid base catalyst for the first time and the products were studied by UV spectroscopy, from which the linear correlation with the Hammett's substituent parameter was obtained.

03200901.gif (2169 bytes)    
           1                               2a-e                                                 3a-e

Table 1 The Data of 5-Arylmethylenerhodanine 3a-e

Entry

R

Yield m. P. (lit. [5] )
(%) (°C)

1H NMR

3a

H

80 199-202(202-203)

3.35 (br, 1H, NH)
7.34,7.54 (s, 5H, C6H5)
7.61 (s, 1H, -CH=)

3b

p-Cl

87 224-230 (225-226)

1.61 (br, 1H, NH)
7.46,7.53 (AB q, J=8.0Hz, 4H, C6H4)
7.70 (s, 1H, -CH=)

3c

p-CH3

83 219-223

2.41 (s, 3H, CH3)
2.91 (br, 1H, NH)
7.29, 7.38 (AB q, J = 8.0Hz, 4H, C6H4)
7.57 (s, 1H, -CH=)

3d

p-OCH3

82 240-246 (230-242 )

3.86 (s, 3H, CH3)
3.44 (b, 1H, NH)
7.05, 7.49 (AB q, J = 6.0Hz, 4H, C6H4)
7.55 (s, 1H, -CH=)

3e

p-N(CH3)2

83 266-270 (240-270)

3.11 (s, 6H, 2CH3)
3.24 (br, 1H, NH)
6.75, 7.36 (AB q, J = 8.7Hz, 4H, C6H4)
7.49 (s, 1H, -CH=)

    The aldol condensation of rhodanine with aldehydes have been known to take place under the catalysis of weak bases (such as amine or alkaline acetate)[4-5]. Recently, potassium fluoride supported on alumina has been found effective solid catalyst and widely used in many organic reactions, especially the condensation reactions of active methylene compounds[6-8]. Thus, the preparation of 5-arylidenerhodanines catalyzed by KF Al2O3 for the first time has been reported in this paper. The higher yield was obtained under higher temperature. If the reaction was carried out in refluxing conditions, the yield is more than 80% (Table 1). This means that even the relatively inactive benzaldehydes with electron-donating group such as p-methyl p-methoxyl and p-dimethylamino group as substituent, the reaction can also go very easily under these conditions. The structures of the 5-arylmethylenerhodanines were determined by their melting point, IR and 1H NMR spectra, which were all consistent with that reported in the literature.
    Furthermore, the UV spectra of the five 5-arylidenerhodanines in seventeen solvents were measured. The maximum absorption wavelength and frequency
nmaxuv were listed in table 2.

Table 2 The maxima lmaxuv and nmaxuvof 5-arylmethylerdoniene 3a-e

solvent

3a H

3b p-Cl

3c p-CH3

3d p-OCH3

3e p-NMe2

lmaxuv

nmaxuv

lmaxuv

nmaxuv

lmaxuv

nmaxuv

lmaxuv

nmaxuv

lmaxuv

nmaxuv

cyclohexane

365.9

2.7330

385.7

2.5927

387.5

2.5806

400.9

2.4944

454.5

2.2002

dichloromethane

380.9

2.6254

384.5

2.6008

387.9

2.5780

398.5

2.5094

472.5

2.1164

chloroform

380.1

2.6309

383.3

2.6089

385.5

2.5940

397.5

2.5157

473.7

2.1110

Carbon tetrachloride

379.1

2.6378

383.5

2.6076

385.7

2.5927

399.1

2.5056

457.9

2.1839

dichloroethane

379.5

2.6350

383.3

2.6089

385.7

2.5927

396.5

2.5221

470.7

2.1245

benzene

381.3

2.6126

386.3

2.5887

387.9

2.5780

400.1

2.4994

463.1

2.1594

toluene

381.1

2.6240

385.7

2.5926

387.5

2.5806

398.3

2.5107

460.7

2.1706

methanol

373.5

2.6714

376.3

2.6575

378.9

2.6392

397.9

2.5132

457.5

2.1858

ethanol

373.9

2.6745

377.7

2.6476

380.1

2.6309

391.3

2.5569

445.3

2.2457

2-propanol

372.5

2.6846

375.9

2.6603

378.7

2.6406

389.7

2.5661

458.3

2.1800

1-butanol

382.9

2.6116

378.1

2.6418

381.3

2.6226

399.5

2.5031

478.3

2.0907

2-methyl-1-propanol

372.3

2.6860

376.3

2.6575

379.7

2.6336

391.5

2.5547

459.9

2.1739

ether

374.5

2.6702

387.7

2.5793

380.9

2.6254

392.3

2.5491

448.3

2.2316

1,4-dioxane

375.9

2.6603

378.7

2.6337

382.5

2.6144

391.3

2.5543

453.5

2.2051

acetonitrile

373.9

2.6745

377.9

2.6462

380.1

2.6309

388.7

2.5727

465.3

2.1491

DMF

373.5

2.6774

377.9

2.6462

377.9

2.6462

385.3

2.5934

426.3

2.3458

DMSO

380.3

2.6295

383.1

2.6103

385.7

2.5927

392.7

2.5465

472.1

2.1182

    It can be seen that the all of substituted groups on the benzene ring can cause the maximum absorption shift bathochromic. It has been well known that the complementary electronic transitions need lower energies no matter the substituent withdrawing or accepting electrons. In order to esteemed the quantitative effect of each substituted group on the UV spectra, we tentatively correlated the maximum wavelength with Hammett's substituent parameter[9](s+p for H, Cl, CH3, OCH3, (CH3)2N is 0, 0.11, -0.31, -0.78, -1.7, respectively). The fine results from the correlation equation nmaxuv= A + B|s+p| was observed. 11 correlation cofficients, R, in 17 were above 0.97, 4 between 0.97 and 0.96, 2 between 0.95 and 0.96 (shown in table 3). The results show that the conjugative effects play more important roles [10 ].

Table 3 Correation of UV Data with Hammett's s+p

solvent

A

B

R

cyclohexane

2.68212

-0.27921

-0.97679

dichloromethane

2.65745

-0.2956

-0.97139

chloroform

2.6684

-0.30397

-0.96978

Carbon tetrachloride

2.65974

-0.26418

-0.98316

1,2-dichloroethane

2.66861

-0.2965

-0.96924

benzene

2.64121

-0.26481

-0.97533

toluene

2.64758

-0.26187

-0.97451

methanol

2.70452

-0.29293

-0.98982

ethanol

2.69558

-0.24907

-0.98042

2-propanol

2.71648

-0.29269

-0.97309

1-butanol

2.68149

-0.32333

-0.96749

2-methyl-1-propanol

2.7136

-0.29334

-0.9774

ether

2.66994

-0.23934

-0.95616

1,4-dioxane

2.6862

-0.26307

-0.97186

acetonitrile

2.7106

-0.3033

-0.96187

DMF

2.69183

-0.1897

-0.9723

DMSO

2.67131

-0.29632

-0.95456

Rhodanine and aromatic aldehydes are commercial reagents for organic synthesis. Solid base KF-Al2O3 (12.5mmol KF on 2.00g alumina) was prepared according to the literature methods[7]. Absolute methanol and the solvent for determining UV spectra are analytical reagents, which were treated according to the standard methods before use. Melting points were determined by capillary tube method. IR spectra were recorded as KBr disks on a Nicolet 170SX IR Spectrometer. 1H NMR data were determined on a Bruker spectrometer(300MHz) with CDCl3 as solvent and TMS as internal reference. UV spectra were recorded on UV 240 spectrometer.
    General Procedure for the reaction of Rhodanine with aromatic aldehydes: To a solution of rhodanine ( 1.33g, 10.0 mmol) and aromatic aldehyde (10.5 mmol) in methanol (20 mL), KF-Al2O3 (1.50g, 9.0 mmol) was added. After stirring under refluxing for about 4 hours, the solid catalyst was filtered off from the reaction mixture. Then the solution was cooled down to room temperature and poured into water. The yellow precipitate was collected and the pure products were obtained by recrystallization from the mixture of ethanol and water.

REFERENCE
[1] Kamlet M J, Abboud J S, Taft R W. J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99: 6027.
[2] Reichardt C, Angew. Chem. Int. End. Engl., 1979, 18: 98.
[3] Wang C S, Pan J X, Gao Zh H. Acta Chimica Sinica (Huaxue Xuebao) , 1988, 46: 548.
[4] Girard M L, Dreux C. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1968, 8: 3461.
[5] Ginak A Z, V yanov K A, Sochilin E G. Zh. Org. Khim., 1971, 7: 1500.
[6] Clark J H. Chem. Rev., 1980, 80 (5): 429.
[7] Yamawaki J, Kawat T, Ando T  et al.  Bull. Soc. Japan, 1983, 56 (6): 1885.
[8] Lu W X, Zhu Q,Yan C G. Synthetic Commun., 1997, 27 (22): 3985.
[9] March J. Advanced Organic Chemistry (2nd edition), New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 253.
[10] Gao Z H, Zhao A H, Wang M Z. Chem. J. of Chin. Univ, 1989, 10 (5): 477.

 


[ Back ] [ Up ] [ Next ] Mirror Site in USA  Europe  China  CSTNet ChinaNet