Synthesis, characterization and crystal
structure of a new binuclear copper(II) complex with indole-3-propionic acid
Deng Xiujun, Bian Hedong, Yu Qing,
Liang Hong
(College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004,
China)
Supported by Teaching and Research Program
for Outstanding Young Teachers in Higher Education Institutions of Ministry of Education,
the Nature Science Foundation of Guangxi Province and the Nature Science Foundation of
Guangxi Normal University.
Abstract A binuclear
copper(II) complex, Cu2(IPA)4(CH3OH)2 (1)
(HIPA = indole-3-propionic acid), was synthesized and characterized by IR,
elemental analysis and X-ray diffraction. The crystal of 1
belongs to Triclinic system, space group P. Two Cu(II) ions in 1
are bridged by four IPA anions to form a binuclear complex. Each central Cu(II) ion is
coordinated by four carboxylate O atoms from four bridging IPA anions and one O atom from
a methanol molecule in distorted square pyramidal geometry.
Keywords indole-3-propionic
acid, crystal structures, binuclear copper complex
1. INTRODUCTION
Indole-3-propionic acid (HIPA), a deamination product of tryptophan is formed by symbiotic
bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of mammals and birds[1]. HIPA may hold
particular promise as a therapeutic agent in human brain diseases[2]. It was
found that anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activity of metal complexes was higher than
in the parent carboxylic acids[3]. The carboxylate group displays a variety of
binding geometries, such as monodentate, chelating, bidentate bridging and monodentate
bridging so in coordination chemistry as well as in the active sites of metalloenzymes[4-8]. It should be noted that the crystal structures of HIPA
have been studied[9,10], but there are seldom reports about the crystal
structure of its metal complexes[11], as yet. In the present paper, Cu2(IPA)4(CH3OH)2
was synthesized and characterized by IR, elemental analysis, and X-ray diffraction.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Instruments and chemicals
IR spectrum was recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum one FT-IR Spectrometer in the 4000
-400 cm-1 region by using KBr pellets. Elemental analysis for C, H and N atoms
were carried out on a Model 2400 II Perkin-Elmer elemental analyzer. All reagents were of
analytical grade from commercial sources and were used without any further purification.
2.2 Synthesis of Cu2(IPA)4(CH3OH)2 (1)
HIPA was dissolved in 5 mL of methanol and the pH value was adjust to about 7 with 1
mol·L-1 NaOH solution. Then the solution of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O
(0.5 mmol) in 10 mL of methanol was added. The mixture was stirred at 60 ºC
for 4 h. and then filtered. The filtrate was allowed to stand in air at room temperature
for several days, yielding green platelike single crystals suitable for analysis.
IR (KBr) n:.
3411.64(vs), 1606.18(s), 1423.69(vs),
1384.79(ms), 1358.64(w), 1226.90(w), 1094.85(m), 1010.66(m), 740.23(s), 613.77(m),
493.85(m)cm-1.
Anal. calcd for C46H48Cu2N4O10:
C, 58.48; H, 5.13; N, 5.93%. found: C, 57.62; H, 5.52; N, 5.86%.
2.3 X-ray crystallography of 1
Table 1 Crystal data
and structure refinement for complex 1
Empirical formula |
C46H48Cu2N4O10 |
Absorption coefficient(mm-1) |
1.020 |
Formula weight |
943.96 |
F(000) |
980 |
Crystal system |
Triclinic |
Crystal size (mm3) |
0.21 × 0.17 × 0.07 |
space group |
P |
q (°) |
1.41 to 25.01 |
a (nm) |
0.7521(2) |
Limiting indices |
-8≤h≤8, -18≤k≤13, -24≤l≤21 |
b (nm) |
1.5799 (3) |
Reflections collected |
10895 |
c (nm) |
2.0432(3) |
Independent reflections |
7338 |
a (°) |
68.330(2) |
Data / restraints / parameters |
7338 / 18/ 559 |
b (°) |
85.804(3) |
Goodness-of-fit on F2 |
0.993 |
g (°) |
79.622(2) |
R [I>2s(I)] |
0.0995 |
Volume (nm3 ) |
2.2192(8) |
wR2 |
0.1555 |
Z |
2 |
Maximum diff. peak (e/nm3) |
1.248 |
Dc (g/cm3) |
1.413 |
Minimum diff. peak (e/nm3) |
-1.351 |
A single crystal of 1 with
dimensions of 0.21 mm × 0.17 mm × 0.07 mm was selected and mounted on a Bruker Smart
1000 diffractometer with Mo Ka radiation (l = 0.071073 nm) by
using an w-scan
technique at 298(2) K. 10895 reflections were collected in the rang of 1.41 to 25.01, of
which 7338 (Rint = 0.0863) unique reflections and 2858 observed ones
with I >2s (I) were used in the succeeding refinements. The
coordinates of the hydrogen atoms were obtained from difference Fourier maps and refined
with a common isotropic thermal parameter. All calculations were carried out using
SHELXS-97[12] and refined by full-matrix least-squares, based on F2,
using SHELXL-97[13] programs. Details of data collection and processing are
given in Table 1.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fig. 1 The
molecular structure of Cu2(IPA)4(CH3OH)2 (H
atoms are omitted for clarity)
The selected bond lengths and bond angles are listed in
Table 2, and Figure 1 shows the molecular structure of 1. In the complex, four IPA
anions adopt bidentate bridging coordination mode using two oxygen atoms of the
carboxylate groups. The Cu···Cu separation is 0.26221(17) nm which is
comparable well to that in the reported dinuclear caboxylate-bridged complexes[14-18].
Each Cu(II) atom is coordinated by five oxygen atoms from four bridging ligands and one
methanol molecule. The Reejijk distortion index t value[19] is 0.00183 nm for Cu1 and 0.00267 nm
for Cu2, respectively, indicating slightly distorted square pyramidal (sp) configuration
for the copper(II) atoms. The equatorial plane of each copper(II) contains of four oxygen
atoms from four ligands with the average Cu-O bond lengths of 0.19744 and 0.19817 nm for Cu1 and Cu2, respectively. Cu1 and Cu2 are displaced by
0.02006 and 0.01854 nm out of the basal plane towards the axial methanol ligand,
respectively. The methanol O atom occupies the apical position of the coordination sphere.
The molecular architecture is stabilized by an extensive 1-D band (Fig.2, Table 3) of
hydrogen bonds (N-H···O) and (O-H···O) involving
the IPA ions and methanol molecules.
Fig. 2 the 1D band diagram of the title compound along
a-axis
(Some atoms have been omitted for carily)
Table 2 Selected bond lengths (nm) and bond angles (o)
Bond length |
|
|
|
Cu(1)-O(5) |
0.1963(7) |
Cu(2)-O(6) |
0.1960(7) |
Cu(1)-O(1) |
0.1967(8) |
Cu(2)-O(4) |
0.1976(7) |
Cu(1)-O(7) |
0.1974(7) |
Cu(2)-O(2) |
0.1987(7) |
Cu(1)-O(3) |
0.1991(7) |
Cu(2)-O(8) |
0.2001(7) |
Cu(1)-O(9) |
0.2156(7) |
Cu(2)-O(10) |
0.2191(7) |
Cu(1)-Cu(2) |
0.26221(17) |
|
|
Bond angle |
|
|
|
O(5)-Cu(1)-O(1) |
167.5(3) |
O(6)-Cu(2)-O(4) |
89.6(3) |
O(5)-Cu(1)-O(7) |
91.0(3) |
O(6)-Cu(2)-O(2) |
170.0(3) |
O(1)-Cu(1)-O(7) |
89.0(3) |
O(4)-Cu(2)-O(2) |
89.4(3) |
O(5)-Cu(1)-O(3) |
90.9(3) |
O(6)-Cu(2)-O(8) |
88.5(3) |
O(1)-Cu(1)-O(3) |
86.7(3) |
O(4)-Cu(2)-O(8) |
168.4(3) |
O(7)-Cu(1)-O(3) |
168.6(3) |
O(2)-Cu(2)-O(8) |
90.6(3) |
O(5)-Cu(1)-O(9) |
97.7(3) |
O(6)-Cu(2)-O(10) |
93.2(3) |
O(1)-Cu(1)-O(9) |
94.7(3) |
O(4)-Cu(2)-O(10) |
95.9(3) |
O(7)-Cu(1)-O(9) |
97.0(3) |
O(2)-Cu(2)-O(10) |
96.8(3) |
O(3)-Cu(1)-O(9) |
93.8(3) |
O(8)-Cu(2)-O(10) |
95.6(3) |
Table 3 Hydrogen-bonding geometry (nm, °)
for the title complex
D-H |
d(D-H) |
d(H..A) |
<DHA |
d(D..A) |
A |
N4-H4 |
0.860 |
2.151 |
151.28 |
2.934 |
O1[-x+3, -y+3, -z+1] |
O9-H9 |
0.820 |
2.452 |
118.53 |
2.934 |
O8[ x+1, y, z ] |
O10-H10 |
0.820 |
2.484 |
133.86 |
3.109 |
O3[ x, y, z ] |
REFERENCES
[1] Young S, Anderson G M, Gauthier S et al. J. Neurochem, 1980, 34: 1087.
[2] Poeggeler B, Pappolla M A, Hardeland R et al. Brain Res, 1999, 815: 382.
[3] Dendrinou-Samara C, Tsotsou G, Ekateriniadou L V et al. J. Inorg. Biochem, 1998, 71:
171.
[4] Ye B H, Chen X M., Xue F et al. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2000, 299: 1.
[5] Lemoine P, Viossat B, Huy D N. J.Inorg. Biochem, 2004, 98: 1734.
[6] Bresolin L, Burow R A, H?rner M et al. Polyhedron, 1997, 16: 3947.
[7] Cui Y, Qian Y T, Huang J S, Polyhedron, 2001, 20: 1795.
[8] Yin M C, Yuan L J, Ai C C et al. Polyhedron, 2004, 23: 529.
[9] Koshima H, Hayashi E, Matsuura T et al. Tetrahedron Lett, 1997, 38: 5009.
[10] Okabe N, Adachi Y, Acta Cryst. C, 1998, 54: 386.
[11] Barbara M O, Ewa R S. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2007, 43: 405.
[12] Sheldrick G M SHELXS-97, Program for X-ray Crystal Structure Solution [M]. University
of Göttingen : Germany, 1997.
[13] Sheldrick G M SHELXL-97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structures [M].
University of G öttingen: Germany, 1997
[14] Wu B, Wang G C. Acta Cryst. E, 2004, 60: m1764
[15] Wang Y Y, Shi Q, Shi Q Z et al. Polyhedron, 2000, 19: 891.
[16] Benisvy L, Quesada M, Turpeinen U et al. Chem. Commun, 2006: 2373.
[17] Calvo P V, Vega A, Spodine E. Organometallics, 2006, 25: 1953
[18] Deka K, Barooah N, Sarma R J et al. J. Mol. Struct, 2007: 44.
[19] Addison A W, Rao T N, Reedijk J et al. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans., 1984:
1349.
一个新型的吲哚-3-丙酸双核铜配合物的合成和晶体结构表征
邓秀君 边贺东 于青 梁宏
(广西师范大学化学化工学院,桂林 541004,中国)
摘要 本文合成了一个新型的双核配合物Cu2(IPA)4(CH3OH)2(HIPA=吲哚-3-丙酸),并用红外、元素分析、X射线衍射等方法对其结构进行表征。该单晶属三斜晶系,空间群为P,晶体结构表明,两个铜原子通过四个配体桥联形成一个双核配合物中。每个Cu2+处于一个畸变的四方锥配位环境中,配位原子分别来自四个配体羧基上的氧原子、以及一个甲醇氧原子。
关键词 吲哚-3-丙酸,晶体结构,双核铜配合物
|