http://www.chemistrymag.org/cji/2002/042008pe.htm

  Jan. 2, 2002  Vol.4 No.2 P.8 Copyright cij17logo.gif (917 bytes)


Synthesis and characterization of poly (butylene terephthalate)-poly(ethylene terephthalate- co- isophthalate- co- sebacate) segmented copolyesters

Zhao Yunhui, Sheng Jing
(School of Materials Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract This paper described the preparation of quarternary segmented copolyesters involving bulk polyester produced on large scale-poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and ternary amorphous random copolyester poly(ethylene terephthalate-co-isophthalate-co-sebacate) (PETIS) by means of melting transesterification processing under vacuum condition. Investigations on thermal properties, crystal structures, and crystallization morphology were undertaken by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), and polarized light microscope (PLM), respectively. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was used in the analysis of copolyesters compositions.The results showed that melting transesterification was an available method to synthesize segmented copolyesters for potential application. The final composition in quarternary copolyesters was approximately equal to the feed ratio. The location of melting and crystallization peaks depended on both feed ratio and reaction time. Reasonable sequence length of copolyester segments, which should give rise to higher melting and crystallization temperatures, might be present in samples with shorter reaction time and higher ternary copolyester content. The optical micrograph exhibited three-dimensional spherulitic growth.
Keywords  segmented copolyester, melting transesterification, poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT), poly (ethylene terephthalate- co- isophthalate- co-sebacate) (PETIS)

1 INTRODUCTION 
Copolyesters, because of their low price and versatile properties for application, have drawn much attention for many years. Most of them are binary or ternary random copolymers, and have been studied extensively by researchers[1-3]. In practice, synthesis of segmented copolyesters with crystallizing segments is an effective way to obtain new polyester material, because regulation of the crystal structure offers an addition possibility of optimizing their properties[4]. Two methods have often been employed to synthesize segmented copolyesters[5]. One is the coupling of prepolymers with relatively low molecular weight, the other is the transesterification by melting processing between bulk homopolymers.
    The addition of aliphatic polyesters in copolyester might render it potential application in elastic fiber and thermoplastic resin with strike properties. Aliphatic polyesters can be used alone or in combination with other polyesters as soft segment to provide elasticity. Recently, in our laboratory we have synthesized a series of segmented copolyesters involving one of the most available polyesters-poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and ternary amorphous random copolyester-poly (ethylene terephthalate-co-isophthalate-co-sebacate) (PETIS) by means of melting transesterification. The fractions of PETIS random copolymer ranged from 60-80% wt % (with the contents of aliphatic polyester PES ranging from 24-28% wt %). This suggests the formation of copolyesters with moderate elasticity.
    Since reaction time plays an important role in melting transesterification, polymerization experiments were carried out at different time for each composition. Investigations on melting and crystallization behaviors were undertaken by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). To confirm the difference in copolyester composition, we performed the 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. Wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) was used in the analysis of crystalline structure.

2 EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Materials

PBT chips were kindly supplied by Yi Zheng Chemical Fiber Co., China. Dimethyl terephthalate (DMT), ethyl glycol (EG), isophthalate acid (IPA), sebacate acid (SA), zinc acetate
(Zn(OAC)2), and tetrabutyl orthotitanate (TBT) were all reagent grade and used as received.
2.2 Synthesis of PETIS random copolyesters and PBT-PETIS segmented copolyesters  
The synthesis of ternary amorphous random copolyesters can be divided into two steps. The first involves the transesterification of DMT and EG with zinc acetate as a catalyst, and the esterification of SA, IPA and EG, yielding bis(hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET), bis(hydroxyethyl) sebacate (BHES), and bis(hydroxyethyl) isophthalate (BHEI). The second one is the principal reaction leading to the formation of copolyester by means of polycondensation in the presence of tetrabutyl orthotitanate
(TBT) as a catalyst.
    The melting transesterification between PBT and PETIS was conducted in a four-neck flask equipped with a mechanically sealed stirrer and condenser under nitrogen atmosphere and vacuum condition less than 133Pa. The melting processing was proceeded isothermally at 255
°C for 10min, 20min, 40min, and 60 min, respectively. The process is given in Scheme1.


                                                                    PETIS


                              PBT

274Image2.gif (1907 bytes)

                                                                                  PBT-PETIS

Scheme 1

2.3 Characterization of PBT-PETIS segmented copolyesters
The intrinsic viscosity was determined at 25±0.1°C in a phenol/1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (50/50, w/w) solution with a concentration of 0.5g/100ml by an Ubbelohde viscometer, and the density was measured with a gradient density column in a thermostat at 25±0.1 using aqueous solution of sodium bromide. Different Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) measurement was carried out on a Shimadzu-50 apparatus calibrated with Al2O3 under nitrogen atmosphere using samples of about 5mg. The sample was heated up to 30°C above the melting temperature at a rate of 10°C/min, and maintained for 5 min to erase the thermal history, and then cooled down at a rate of 10°C/min to room temperature. Wide angle X-ray diffraction measurement (WAXD) was done on melt-pressed films in the reflection mode with a Rigaku diffractmeter using Ni-filtered Cu-Ka radiation. The 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (NMR) were recorded with a Varian UNITY-plus400MHz NMR spectrometer by dissolving samples in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3). Copolyester sample was sandwiched in between two pieces of glass slides followed by melting completely. Then the specimen was rapidly quenched to the predetermined crystallization temperature and maintained for 2 hours. Crystalline morphology of copolyester was investigated using a polarized light microscopy (PLM).

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION           
Segmented copolyesters at room temperature appear soft or hard semi-crystalline solids according to compositions. The samples with varying compositions are given in Table 1, where intrinsic viscosity and density are also reported.
     The values of intrinsic viscosity demonstrate that melting transesterification is available and yields copolyesters having molecular weights high enough for usual application. Moreover, because of the high values of intrinsic viscosity, effect caused by the discrepancy of molecular weight on properties can be negligible. The density had a little variation for samples with different reaction time, but increased slightly with increasing PBT content in segmented copolyesters.

    All copolyester samples show lower melting peaks compared to the PBT homopolymer. The depression of melting temperature is due to the limited crystallite size and to the larger amount of crystal imperfection because of the less favourable crystallization conditions[6]. DSC curves in the heating run reveal double melting peaks for PBT-rich copolyesters, which is however a widespread observation that has been reported in the literatures[7,8]. Park and Kang[9] pointed out that the lower one can be attributed to melting of PBT crystal related to ternary random copolyester, and the other to that of pure PBT crystal. Rim and Runt[10], however, thought that the multiple-melting endotherms may result from reorganization processes. They explained the phenomenon as follows: the low-temperature endotherm reflects the true melting behavior of the as formed crystals while the higher temperature endotherm represents the melting of material that has undergone annealing upon heating. For comparison, endothermic peaks were presented in Fig.1 according to reaction time. Table II collected the summary of corresponding thermal properties. The double melting peaks are marked Tm1 and Tm2 in Table II respectively, and
DHm is the heat of fusion; Tc and DHc are the maximum and the enthalpy of exothermic peak, respectively.

Table 1 Designated Samples and Their Intrinsic Viscosity and Density

Samples

Feed ratio (wt %)
(PET/PEI/PES) = 40/20/40

Reaction time (min)

Intrinsic viscosity
(dL·g -1)

Density
(g
·cm -3)

PBT

PBT/(PET/PEI/PES)

PBT

100

100/(0/0/0)

 

0.8000

1.2795

20PBT-10

20

20/(32/16/32)

10

0.5930

1.2596

20PBT-20

20

20/(32/16/32)

20

0.5860

1.2591

20PBT-40

20

20/(32/16/32)

40

0.6231

1.2596

20PBT-60

20

20/(32/16/32)

60

0.6350

1.2601

30PBT-10

30

30/(28/14/28)

10

0.5213

1.2642

30PBT-20

30

30/(28/14/28)

20

0.5647

1.2637

30PBT-40

30

30/(28/14/28)

40

0.6074

1.2634

30PBT-60

30

30/(28/14/28)

60

0.5617

1.2640

40PBT-10

40

40/(24/12/24)

10

0.6030

1.2679

40PBT-20

40

40/(24/12/24)

20

0.5955

1.2687

40PBT-40

40

40/(24/12/24)

40

0.6536

1.2671

40PBT-60

40

40/(24/12/24)

60

0.6502

1.2689

PETIS

0

0/(40/20/40)

150

0.4866

1.2476

    From Table 2, we can find that all DSC curves show melting peak whose location depends on both the composition and reaction time. Firstly, melting peaks gradually move to lower temperature region and become wider when the content of PBT segment is increased. High feed fraction of amorphous copolyester PETIS should give rise to relatively long sequence of soft segment, which might favor forming of regular crystals of PBT. On the other hand, relatively short amorphous random copolyester segments, which during melting transesterification are generated from low feed fraction of amorphous copolyester, might act as crystal imperfection. As a result, the melting temperatures are depressed, and this is the reason for wider range of melting peaks. Secondly, for a chosen composition, sample with shorter reaction time revealed higher melting temperature than those of with longer reaction time. Extended reaction time promoted shorter sequence length of polyesters[10], which result in lower melting temperatures. Moreover, the broadened distribution of sequence length caused by prolonged reaction time is the reason for wide range of melting temperature.
    In the same manner, lower crystallization temperatures are presented in PBT-rich samples as well as samples with longer reaction time. The depression of Tc is seemingly because of the incorporation of short sequence length of noncrystallizable copolyester segments generated by decreased amorphous polyester content and prolonged reaction time.

Table 2 Characteristic Data of Melting and Crystallization

Samples

Tm1
(
°C)

Tm2
(
°C)

Tm,onset
(
°C)

Tm,endset(°C)

DHm
(J·g -1)

Tc
(
°C)

Tc,onset
(
°C)

Tc,endset
(
°C)

DHc
(J·g -1)

PBT

-a

225.29

206.57

238.28

43.76

183.43

194.84

173.21

42.51

20PBT-10

-

224.70

204.81

231.87

14.47

177.56

185.77

171.39

11.07

20PBT-20

-

220.88

200.13

229.19

13.30

170.61

179.13

163.99

10.46

20PBT-40

-

214.40

147.55

225.15

13.66

160.29

169.63

153.28

10.83

20PBT-60

-

182.20

140.87

209.48

6.44

126.97

139.99

117.03

5.95

30PBT-10

197.20

214.46

187.21

225.21

18.31

164.73

173.44

155.75

13.86

30PBT-20

186.72

200.09

157.89

214.89

16.10

145.70

155.68

137.31

13.31

30PBT-40

176.58

187.52

135.32

206.50

16.60

131.92

143.63

123.24

12.77

30PBT-60

171.81

176.09

124.84

200.54

15.02

129.29

140.29

120.35

10.10

40PBT-10

200.07

212.36

180.95

222.89

20.06

159.43

169.45

149.52

17.82

40PBT-20

184.98

198.87

157.14

213.85

22.91

142.92

152.95

134.04

17.67

40PBT-40

168.09

173.86

135.19

207.34

18.30

124.05

137.81

114.31

15.91

40PBT-60

168.50

184.46

131.71

194.78

15.13

116.19

129.64

106.65

15.44

a : not detected

    In the WAXD patterns of PBT, five diffraction peaks, namely, 16.1 o, 17.2 o, 20.6 o, 23.1 o, and 25.2 o are assigned for the (), (010), (), (100), and () plane, respectively. With the increasing content of amorphous copolyester PETIS, the diffraction peaks tend to be broaden, but still exihibit the PBT-related scattering angles. The patterns for samples with 30% PBT(wt%) at various reaction time shown in Fig.2 confirm that reaction time has intensive influence on melting transesterification processing. The intensity of diffraction peaks become weaker as the reaction time is prolonged, which infers the change from segmented into random by the interchange between two different kinds of polyesters. Attempt has been made to divide patterns into separate Gaussian profiles, and then crystallite dimensions can also be calculated by using Scherrer equation as follows:[12]
             (1)


Fig.1 melting endotherms of sample with 30% PBT (wt %) (reaction time indicated)


Fig.2
WAXD patterns of sample with 30% PBT (wt %) (reaction time indicated)


    where D is the mean crystallite dimension;
q , the Bragg angle; l , the wave length (0.1542nm); b , the half-high breadth at the Bragg scattering angle; and k is a constant (0.89). The calculation was done only for the (010), (), and (100) planes whose Bragg angle is quite clear in the patterns. Table 3 collected the crystallography data. The dimensions of segmented copolyesters are very smaller than those of PBT homopolymer for which the melting behavior provided early indication, but there is a trace discrepancy among segmented copolyester samples.

Table 3 Crystallography Data of WAXD

Samples

(010)

()

(100)

2q(o)

b(o)

D(nm)

2q(o)

b(o)

D(nm)

2q(o)

b(o)

D(nm)

PBT

17.2

2.211

3.597

20.6

1.859

4.299

23.1

1.662

4.829

20PBT-10

17.1

2.938

2.707

20.2

2.582

3.094

23.7

4.917

1.634

20PBT-20

17.8

3.450

2.307

20.6

2.293

3.485

23.6

4.342

1.850

20PBT-40

17.5

3.252

2.447

20.4

2.397

3.334

23.3

3.717

2.160

20PBT-60

17.2

3.301

2.409

20.5

3.018

2.648

23.7

2.830

2.839

30PBT-10

17.5

2.953

2.694

20.9

2.918

2.740

23.5

2.916

2.720

30PBT-20

17.5

3.291

2.418

20.4

2.105

3.796

23.5

3.571

2.249

30PBT-40

17.4

3.618

2.199

20.4

2.407

3.320

23.5

3.205

2.506

30PBT-60

17.7

3.888

2.047

20.7

2.398

3.335

23.8

3.661

2.195

40PBT-10

17.3

2.977

2.672

20.2

2.047

3.903

23.4

3.453

2.326

40PBT-20

16.8

3.004

2.646

20.4

1.920

4.161

23.6

2.895

2.775

40PBT-40

17.7

2.970

2.680

20.4

2.316

3.450

23.6

3.317

2.422

40PBT-60

17.5

3.798

2.095

20.4

2.428

3.291

23.5

3.236

2.482

    Although sequence distribution in the copolyester chain is very important to the understanding of its chemical structure, only a few papers[9,13] reported the investigation on sequence distribution between aromatic polyester and ternary or binary aliphatic copolyesters. One technical problem associated with is the interchange between PBT and PETIS may result in very complex constitution. Investigation on sequence distribution is being conducted. The analysis of NMR in this work is in progress for testing the composition on PBT-PETIS. Fig.3 shows the spectra of PBT homopolymer, PETIS random copolyester, and segmented copolyester 30PBT-40. Assignments of proton signals are listed in table 4.


                                                                             PBT

   
               
PETIS

                                        30PBT-40                                                       

Fig.3 1H-NMR spectra

 

 

Table 3 Assignments of Proton Signal and Their Chemical Shift in the 1H-NMR Spectra

 

PBT

PETIS

PBT-PETIS

(ppm)

δ  (ppm)

e

δ  (ppm)

e

I1

  

8.758

3.14

8.761

3.00

I2

  

8.293

7.20

7.295

6.95

I3

  

7.597

3.16

7.595

3.41

T b

8.09

8.160

24.66

8.148

46.13

A1

   

2.371

22.76

2.373

21.81

A2

   

1.644

23.22

1.649

21.73

A3

  

1.320

46.94

1.322

43.85

X1

4.43

         

4.486

21.23

X2

1.97

         

2.028

21.44

X3-X5

    

4.751

23.96

4.753

25.09

      

4.478

14.10

4.486

14.10

      

4.589

16.52

4.592

15.17

       

4.314

8.69

4.316

7.30

b:
Image80.gif (5002 bytes)
    The peaks at 1.32-2.37 ppm were assigned to the protons in sebacate group, and the ethylene proton resonance of PES units which are located at 4.31-4.75 ppm overlapped with the ethylene proton peak of PEI units in PETIS. When the PBT units were introduced, the chemical shift attributed to protons in the tetramethylene unit appear at 2.03 and 4.49 ppm, and also the final composition was confirmed by NMR data. The molar ratio of PBT: PET was about 1.1486:1, which approximates the feed ratio 1.0694:1.

       20PBT-20                                     30PBT-20                             40PBT-20
Fig.4 optical micrographs of samples

    Spherulite morphology of PBT homopolymer has been observed by Stein[14] to have two types. One leads to growth of unusual spherulite at low temperature, and the other to usual spherulite at high temperature. In copolyesters, the two types of spherulites may be somewhat more indistinct, coexist together, and a transitional spherulite is favoured.
     Early work by Keith and Padden[15] proposed a parameter to characterize the internal morphology of a spherulite:
          (2)
  where B is the diffusion coefficient for noncrystallizable content; and G, the radial growth rate of the spherulite. For high concentration of noncrystallizable polyester PETIS, since the PETIS repeating units enter the PBT main chain to a minor degree on the process of melting transesterification for causing the long sequence length of PETIS segments and the high growth rate of crystals, may it be supposed that, in the formation of the crystals, the spherulites not only pack themselves densely, but also form finer fibrils. Consequently, the value of s decreases and optical micrograph of PBT-PETIS samples reported in Fig.4 showed nice spherulite images in copolyesters with 20%PBT and 30%PBT. Conversely, the spherulitic character is not evident for samples with relatively lower concentration of noncrystallizable polyester.

Acknowledgement   The authors acknowledge the financial support of Petrochemical Co., China.

REFERENCES    
[1] Yu J Y, Li B Z, Lee S W. J Appl Polym Sci, 1999, 73: 1191.
[2] Lotti N, Finelli L, Fiorini M. Polymer, 2000, 41: 5297.
[3] Tsai H B, Chang S J, Chen M S. Polymer, 1990, 31: 1589.
[4] Godovsky Y, Yanul N A, Bessonsva N P. Colloid Polym Sci, 1991, 269: 901.
[5] Cheng X M, Luo X L, Li Z B, et al. J Polym Sci, Polym Chem, 1999, 37: 3770
.
[6] Gabriëlse W, Soliman M, Dijkstra K. Macromolecules, 2001, 34: 1685.
[7] Park S S, Chae S H, Im, S S. J Polym Sci, Polym Chem, 1998, 36: 147.
[8] Marrs W, Peters R H, Still R H. J Appl Polym Sci, 1979, 23: 1063.
[9] Park S S, Kang H J. Polym J, 1999, 31: 238.
[10] Rim P B, Runt J P. Macromolecules, 1983, 16 (5): 762.
[11] Yamadera R, Murano M. J Polym Sci, Part A-1, 1967, 5: 2259.
[12] Alexander L E. X-ray Diffraction Method in Polymer Science, Krieger R E Publ. 1979.
[13] Kang H J, Park S S. J Appl Polym Sci, 1999, 72 (4): 593.
[14] Stein R S, Misra A. J Polym Sci, Polym Phys Ed, 1980, 18: 327.
[15] Keith H D, Padden F J Jr. J Appl Phys, 1963, 34: 2409.

 

[ Back ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next ] Mirror Site in  USA  Europe  China  ChinaNet   GBNet